• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only thing hindering AI from taking 99% of the jobs is that robotic engineers still can’t create a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      well, that and the fact that it can’t actually do something to the same level of quality.

      but that’s not going to stop it from taking the jobs. only from actually completing them successfully after it does so.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean, I would add to this list:

      • Humans are way cheaper to recruit, maintain, and produce. Robots only compete on their potential for sociopathicly blind loyalty.
      • Computers are deeply fucking stupid in ways that most normal humans cannot even understand, until something tragic happens directly to them, as a reuslt. (And no, AI hasn’t fixed this. It put a really cool looking coat of razor thin paint over it.)
        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          eh, sort of.

          I work in automotive manufacturing. it’s a huge world. there are tons of people involved in designing, building, and running these cells.

          also, the human part is pretty much always the most basic shit - loading and unloading feeders, moving material around with a forklift, loading parts by hand into the machine from material bins because it’s cheaper to hire someone to do that complex task (that is not sarcastic, picking something up from a loose bin and placing it in a known orientation is a difficult task to automate) than to teach and operate a robot for that

          I don’t know how line operators stay sane. I’ve designed cells where it’s somebody’s job to do the same dozen motions every minute for an entire shift. many cells like that.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            When I wrote that I was thinking in particular about the automated car factories in Japan that run without lights to save electricity.

            But I take your point, there are still humans involved in the process.

            • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’ll have to look into those and see what level of autonomy is happening, thanks for the info. a quick search says they do some welding as well. usually the fully automated stuff is just final assembly stuff and paint, which is simpler to automate because everything is in known locations.

              that’s also kind of why I always find it funny when people brag about where the final assembly of a vehicle happens - okay but like where did all the parts come from? there’s four $5 million cells in Mexico, designed and built by Canadians, making the rear subframe and employing hundreds of people; why is a car “American” because you put the last pieces together in the US?

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Realistically, most jobs don’t NEED hands. Most physical jobs can be done better with customized manipulators for the type of work being done.

      We’d only need hands if we wanted a single robot model that could do multiple types of jobs, instead of a specific robot for each job.