Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoChina's new iron battery hits 99.4 percent efficiency over 6000 cyclesinterestingengineering.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1256cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1256external-linkChina's new iron battery hits 99.4 percent efficiency over 6000 cyclesinterestingengineering.comGsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareasbestos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·20 hours agoWhy is there never a single relevant metric mentioned? Here its only cycles and efficiency (which I assume is capacity).
minus-squarefrongt@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·20 hours agoThis article is just blogspam reporting of an SCMP article, which also doesn’t link to the paper, which is here: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aenm.202506734 But the full text is not available there. You might be able to find it elsewhere.
minus-squareWesternInfidels@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 hours ago First published: 01 April 2026 Now, is that cause for worry or am I silly?
minus-squarefrongt@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·19 hours agoI don’t think China does April Fools’ Day.
minus-squarefonix232@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 hours agoScientists generally don’t do it. Now, Feynman day (11 May) on the other hand…
Why is there never a single relevant metric mentioned? Here its only cycles and efficiency (which I assume is capacity).
This article is just blogspam reporting of an SCMP article, which also doesn’t link to the paper, which is here: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aenm.202506734
But the full text is not available there. You might be able to find it elsewhere.
Now, is that cause for worry or am I silly?
I don’t think China does April Fools’ Day.
Scientists generally don’t do it.
Now, Feynman day (11 May) on the other hand…