• HopeOfTheGunblade@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    IDK man kinda seems like some fuckwit set them up to do a shitload more damage than some flashy boom, with just some terrain features.

    Kinda seems like people have talismanic ideas about nukes, likve they’ve ceased to be strategic and migrated to the realm of superstition.

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    By “highly enriched” they mean no where close to weapons grade should put that front and center as well as all evidence being Iran never has, by all evidence ever attempted to build a nuke.

  • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The nuclear propoganda surrounding Iran is crazy. The world has seen the most recent example of North Korea. When was the last time you heard about them, they removed the missile defense system from SK. NK is basically a member of the international community now.

    What do you get when you get rid of your nukes? You get Ukraine. What do you get when you enter into an agreement to not develop the ability to create fissile material for bombs? You get Iran.

    The only way to be safe from the precision bombing powers is to have a nuclear weapon available. We are entering a new era of nuclear proliferation.

  • newton@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Sure ,mossad told this to CBC news.

    We’ve heard this shit before ,in the weeks before the invasion of Iraq , nothing was later found

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Sure ,mossad told this to CBC news.

      • It’s syndicated from the Associated Press. CBC News did not write this. Right there in the byline.
      • It’s based on an interview from the head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi. First paragraph.
      • In a world where your fantasy version of events is what happened, why would CBC News be citing “UN nuclear agency” as their source in the headline?

      Good job not reading the article literally at all, dipshit.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You didn’t have to add “dipshit”.

          That’s true, but since they decided to follow it up with homophobia, I’ve decided not to feel bad over it.

      • newton@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We have all heard these Lies when America attacked Iraq, both during the first and second invasion and it turns out… No weapons of mass destruction or nukes. Everyone now sees your lies.

        I think it’s a nice name dipshit. I will use it as a new profile. Thetechnician 27dipshit. Thanks maga

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I will use it as a new profile.

          Mossad told you to do this, didn’t they? Even the opposition is in their pocket.


          Edit: All jokes aside, no attempt to justify or even acknowledge your bullshit claim about CBC News.

          • newton@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Edit, unfortunately the rest of the world can no longer trust you. The news that we can see on several hundred live TV channels from the states regularly makes us doubt the thinking ability of an average American.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They seem a good deal more responsible than certain other governments with nukes, so I can’t really bring myself to care.

  • misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is there an international treaty that Iran is a signatory to that would prohibit them from this? They’re a sovereign nation that has right to manufacture nuclear arms, same as US, North Korea, Israel, Russia, China or France do.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Obama: I think, you will find this method of internationally vetted uranium enrichment will allow you to err… continue using nuclear power for civillian purpouses and keep the international community calm

    Iranian leadership : agreeable

    Trump : FUCK YOU

    Iranian leadership : Nukes it is.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    They are more reasonable than Israel, which has never allowed inspectors, still denies having bombs, and is on a full-blown genocidal rampage

  • egerlach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Would certainly be nice to have an agreement that allows for nuclear inspectors so this theory could be validated.