cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/8633601
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 was preceded by something less visible but equally deliberate: a sustained information offensive designed to paralyze Western decision-making, fracture allied cohesion, and make the invasion seem if not justified, then at least comprehensible to confused audiences. By the time Russian tanks crossed the border, the information war had already been running for years.
…
The aim of Russian disinformation campaigns is not to convince audiences of a single false narrative. It is to generate doubt, confusion, and informational exhaustion. After Russia shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in July 2014, killing 298 people, Russian-linked outlets promoted multiple mutually contradictory explanations — including Ukrainian responsibility and Western fabrication — within the same news cycle.
…
Moscow’s foreign information manipulation is an integral component of its military doctrine, what Western analysts call the “Gerasimov doctrine” after Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. It views information warfare as a critical element of kinetic operations, deployed alongside cyberattacks, attacks on infrastructure, and covert action.
…
The Kremlin’s disinformation system is sustained by serious institutional investment. State-controlled television network RT alone receives over €350 million per year in state subsidies. Russia’s 2025 and 2026 federal budgets each allocated approximately €1.5 billion to state-controlled media, a nearly 30 percent increase over 2021 levels. The Internet Research Agency’s Project Lakhta, the operation behind the 2016 U.S. election interference campaign, ran on a monthly budget of $1.25 million.
…
European responses to Russian disinformation address important components of the problem, but they do not yet add up to a system. France’s VIGINUM, established in 2021, provides rule-based detection of foreign digital interference. EUvsDisinfo, run by the East StratCom Task Force, has documented and attributed pro-Kremlin narratives since 2015. During COVID-19, the Re-open EU platform demonstrated that a single authoritative information reference point can function effectively under pressure. Before Russia’s 2022 invasion, the United States and United Kingdom publicly released intelligence to pre-empt Russia’s planned false-flag narratives, a prebunking operation that complicated Moscow’s information strategy and helped sustain allied cohesion.
…
Additionally, the EU’s most prominent counter-disinformation initiatives — including EUvsDisinfo and the European Digital Media Observatory — operate on budgets in the €2–11 million range per initiative. Even in aggregate, identifiable EU-level spending amounts to tens of millions to low hundreds of millions of euros.
The EU’s defenses, designed mostly for peacetime communications challenges, are now being tested by a wartime adversary, and they are not up to the challenge. In the brief, we describe three structural changes that could substantially improve Europe’s position.
…


Fucking yes.
Half the reason I’m on Lemmy is to follow people like Yogthos and Davel@lemmy.ml and fucking bunch of others, to see what Russia is currently pushing.
It’s just that a lot of the time late at night I end up trying to upvote something I know a Russian has posted, because I happen to agree with it. (Only for my vote to not be registered because they’ve permabanned me from anywhere they post at.) Because good disinfo relies on disseminating disinfo diluted into a lot of truth.
To anyone interested about disinfo and propaganda in general, this really was a good read.
One of the Allies’ Secret Weapons Against the Nazis Was a 21-Year-Old Woman Armed With a Microphone and a Script of Lies
Obviously Russia is doing the same online. They’d be fucking stupid not to. And the one thing Russia isn’t that bad at is spycraft so…