Is defending pedophilia REALLY the stance you want to take?
If some rich asshole buys an island and brings all his rich asshole friends to the island, and they spend their time sexualizing mailboxes? I mean…not my thing, but I’m not angry. I’m not judging them. I’d be a bit confused, but I also wouldn’t seek answers.
And feet? Well, that can go two ways. If the feet are either fake, or attatched to a consenting adult? That’s fine. Again, not MY thing, but nobody is being hurt here. If the feet were either severed, or attatched to a non-consenting adult? Then we have a problem.
But there is no outcome I can fathom where child nudity in media is ok. Sure, not EVERYONE would sexualize it, but some WOULD sexualize it. THATS the problem.
I see no avenues where someone sexualizing a mailbox leads to rape, or worse, child rape. Because at NO POINT can a child ever consent. All child sex is child rape. So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”
And this then turns into a case of “this is why we can’t have nice things”. The 10% ruin it for the 90%. Then you remember the thing being discussed is child nudity, realize it’s not a loss at all taking that away. It’s not a nice thing you’re losing.
So from that perspective I REALLY have to question why you’re so insistant on enabling pedophiles.
So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”
10% of the world is sexualizing you, what happens to you now? The world needs to act—i guess it has to remove… you? Yes… remove you is the solution to pedophilia! Removing you ends pedophilia! Interesting.
Point is, just because rule34 exists of someone doesn’t mean the problem is rule34. What if I add in something that I made for my mom to enjoy and that gives a hard on to some weirdos. Must I now change my art for my mom to enjoy because weirdos get a hard on? These are the questions people ask and they reason differently than you do. You can’t accept that for some reason.
Is defending pedophilia REALLY the stance you want to take?
If some rich asshole buys an island and brings all his rich asshole friends to the island, and they spend their time sexualizing mailboxes? I mean…not my thing, but I’m not angry. I’m not judging them. I’d be a bit confused, but I also wouldn’t seek answers.
And feet? Well, that can go two ways. If the feet are either fake, or attatched to a consenting adult? That’s fine. Again, not MY thing, but nobody is being hurt here. If the feet were either severed, or attatched to a non-consenting adult? Then we have a problem.
But there is no outcome I can fathom where child nudity in media is ok. Sure, not EVERYONE would sexualize it, but some WOULD sexualize it. THATS the problem.
I see no avenues where someone sexualizing a mailbox leads to rape, or worse, child rape. Because at NO POINT can a child ever consent. All child sex is child rape. So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”
And this then turns into a case of “this is why we can’t have nice things”. The 10% ruin it for the 90%. Then you remember the thing being discussed is child nudity, realize it’s not a loss at all taking that away. It’s not a nice thing you’re losing.
So from that perspective I REALLY have to question why you’re so insistant on enabling pedophiles.
10% of the world is sexualizing you, what happens to you now? The world needs to act—i guess it has to remove… you? Yes… remove you is the solution to pedophilia! Removing you ends pedophilia! Interesting.
Point is, just because rule34 exists of someone doesn’t mean the problem is rule34. What if I add in something that I made for my mom to enjoy and that gives a hard on to some weirdos. Must I now change my art for my mom to enjoy because weirdos get a hard on? These are the questions people ask and they reason differently than you do. You can’t accept that for some reason.
Nudity is not sex. Why the fuck do you care so much as child sex anyways that you seem to have a fixation talking about it.
All it looks like from where I stand is your the only pedophile here.
You really have lost your mind. Maybe don’t listen to any Nirvana albums or you might implode.
I prefer realism.
The Hulk is really gonna keep his pants (shorts even) after his shirt and everything else he’s ripped?
Like if something is gonna rip your clothes, it’s kinda gotta.