• artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A mistake so big they made it twice. It’s amazing how you can throw like, infinite money at VR with the expectation that consumers will just wear these things on their faces all day long and still fail.

      Valve has and will continue to succeed because they operate on the only genre suitable for VR: gaming.

      And porn, but mostly gaming.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Does Steam really succeed with VR though? I don’t know anyone with a VR headset and I know a lot of people who use Steam.

        • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I wish I spent more when I did… I bought the oculus rift, then some shit company bought it and tried to claim the hardware wasn’t mine, and tried to extort money from me. it sits on the floor doing nothing now. a reminder that corpos are never to be trusted

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s niche. Many people get motion sick in VR and having Meta as the only affordable option pretty much throttles VR.

        • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          HI! HTC Vive OG owner here since 2018/19, over 100 VR titles, I know quite a few others with different headsets from Index to Meta to pico, also know at least 3 looking forward to Steam Frame. Tho it is still too niche and these stupid memory prices are going to hurt us bad. Under windows steamVR is great, under linux steamVR is good and getting better all the time, in the meantime there is WLX-Overlay.

          • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, replacing your laptop, monitors and desk space at work. The price point makes a lot more sense. And so does the hardware inside.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It makes absolutely no sense. And I’ve never seen any statements or marketing from Apple that makes such a suggestion.

              • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Key point is yet.

                Interesting article! I’m not at all up to speed on the hardware specs vs the meta quest so I’m not sure how that translates.

                • tal@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  22 hours ago

                  Don’t get me wrong — I’d like to have a “monitor replacement HMD” myself, and it’s one reason that I’ve been watching the area. When things here there, I will probably get an HMD myself. And I think that there will come a day — unless some sort of brain-interface thing gets there first — where HMDs wind up at a monitor level. It’s just that in 2026, the hardware is still pretty limited for that application.