diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to General Memes & Private Chuckle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up1835file-text
arrow-up1835imageSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comdiffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to General Memes & Private Chuckle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square242fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareA404@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoI hate the fact that theres no better alternate to nuclear.
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·2 days agoExcept, you know, solar and wind power, which are like and order of magnitude cheaper and way faster to build.
minus-squareRamenJunkie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 days agoWhat if we put the nuclear reactor up in space, really far away, then used devices of some kind of revieve the energy it transmits to us via low level radiation?
minus-squaredmention7@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agoRight… I suppose next you’re going to say it could be one of those fusion reactors that are always just 10 years away!
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoThere a really big one only 8 minutes away
minus-squarebarrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoPlease do not make Fuel Rods from God.
minus-squareCanonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoDirty kinetic impactor is the name of my garrage band.
minus-squaretacosanonymous@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoWithout heat dissipation, nuclear reactors go boom. If we’re using space, I think there be even more feasible to use solar and hydrogen.
minus-squareRamenJunkie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoI was just referring to the sun in a non technical way.
minus-square18107@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoI was thinking more like a large fusion reactor using gravitational containment. I don’t think the temperature will be too much of an issue.
I hate the fact that theres no better alternate to nuclear.
Except, you know, solar and wind power, which are like and order of magnitude cheaper and way faster to build.
What if we put the nuclear reactor up in space, really far away, then used devices of some kind of revieve the energy it transmits to us via low level radiation?
Right… I suppose next you’re going to say it could be one of those fusion reactors that are always just 10 years away!
There a really big one only 8 minutes away
Please do not make Fuel Rods from God.
Dirty kinetic impactor is the name of my garrage band.
Without heat dissipation, nuclear reactors go boom.
If we’re using space, I think there be even more feasible to use solar and hydrogen.
I was just referring to the sun in a non technical way.
Ohhh. I get it.
I was thinking more like a large fusion reactor using gravitational containment. I don’t think the temperature will be too much of an issue.