diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to General Memes & Private Chuckle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agoSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square249fedilinkarrow-up1861file-text
arrow-up1861imageSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comdiffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to General Memes & Private Chuckle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square249fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareA404@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoI hate the fact that theres no better alternate to nuclear.
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 months agoExcept, you know, solar and wind power, which are like and order of magnitude cheaper and way faster to build.
minus-squareRamenJunkie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 months agoWhat if we put the nuclear reactor up in space, really far away, then used devices of some kind of revieve the energy it transmits to us via low level radiation?
minus-squaredmention7@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoRight… I suppose next you’re going to say it could be one of those fusion reactors that are always just 10 years away!
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 months agoThere a really big one only 8 minutes away
minus-squarebarrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoPlease do not make Fuel Rods from God.
minus-squareCanonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoDirty kinetic impactor is the name of my garrage band.
minus-squaretacosanonymous@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoWithout heat dissipation, nuclear reactors go boom. If we’re using space, I think there be even more feasible to use solar and hydrogen.
minus-squareRamenJunkie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoI was just referring to the sun in a non technical way.
minus-square18107@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoI was thinking more like a large fusion reactor using gravitational containment. I don’t think the temperature will be too much of an issue.
I hate the fact that theres no better alternate to nuclear.
Except, you know, solar and wind power, which are like and order of magnitude cheaper and way faster to build.
What if we put the nuclear reactor up in space, really far away, then used devices of some kind of revieve the energy it transmits to us via low level radiation?
Right… I suppose next you’re going to say it could be one of those fusion reactors that are always just 10 years away!
There a really big one only 8 minutes away
Please do not make Fuel Rods from God.
Dirty kinetic impactor is the name of my garrage band.
Without heat dissipation, nuclear reactors go boom.
If we’re using space, I think there be even more feasible to use solar and hydrogen.
I was just referring to the sun in a non technical way.
Ohhh. I get it.
I was thinking more like a large fusion reactor using gravitational containment. I don’t think the temperature will be too much of an issue.