A few days back I watched a SomeOrdinaryGamers video, in which he states to drive a Tesla car, despite expressing the obvious privacy concerns surrounding the built-in camera system; but doesn’t seem to consider the privacy-impact to those around the vehicle, he chooses to drive through public streets. And another example being Rob Braxman, while ironically, both known to frequently criticize other public-facing, internet connected surveillance systems (like Ring for example).
If it was “just” a cabin camera, staring you straight in the face every time you drive your car (and you’re somehow okay with that), it would still be a terrible look in context with your channel content, but at least it is contained to you personally. But knowingly driving these surveillance nightmares on wheels through public streets, subjecting others to that surveillance, while you represent pro-privacy channels online, is just inexcusably hypocritical to me. But perhaps it might just be me, so what are your thoughts?
If you are a privacy advocate and driving a Tesla, you are a grifter.
This isn’t, “You can’t criticize capitalism while being in a capitalistic system.”
Tesla is one product among hundreds of consumer choices. They are choosing to drive around with the equivalent of 9 Ring and Flock cameras taped to themselves.
Reminds me,… I have heard priv advocates propose a consumer label. Like we have nutritions labels on food products but for privacy.
Their idea is, there are so many products. It is almost impossible for average consumer to even know how much data their car, blutooth gizmo, or smart TV collects. With a mandatory label, they could be better informed. Companies could even compete on it. Just like car co’s first bitched about car safety features but later competed to have the best safety ratings.
But that label idea would need teeth. Gov agencies tasked to test it. And enforce compliance. That’s the hard part.
I do like Rob’s content occasionally, whenever he doesn’t repeat, that which he has discussed a million times before. But yes, I totally agree with the rest of the comment.