• LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Whoa there, chill out. I’m not trying to justify anything and I didn’t say anything about shooting a gun into the air at an airplane.

    My point was that hitting aircraft with a laser is pretty much a fuck you in the ass federal offense, whereas firing a gun in public, into the ground for example, will most likely only be a local or state level charge, if anything at all, especially if there’s no injuries or proved intent of harm.

    Also, IANAL.

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      I am chill, but I have no interest in mincing words: what you said was very stupid and can (and does) get people killed. Don’t shoot guns in the air. If that’s the only plan you can think of, do nothing until you think of a better plan.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      Pointing laser pointers at planes is a federal crime because air traffic is federally regulated. Reckless discharge (steady lads) in a high traffic area, which is where flock cameras are located, falls under state jurisdiction because those laws are state regulated.

      The jurisdiction in which a crime is committed does not dictate the severity of the punishment - while lasering a plane generally carries a severe punishment, it’s unlikely it would even be noticed by the crew unless you’re specifically targeting that plane. It’s certainly going to carry a lower sentence than reckless discharge (steady) in a populated area during the commission of a crime.