• Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    54 minutes ago

    I have MX Linux on a 14 year old Dell Laptop.

    Works great because it’s got a lightweight desktop, and it has a tool (a GUI tool even!) that seamlessly merges the last available Nvidia 340 drivers for my GPU into the latest kernel. Parked at the desktop with no desktop apps running, it uses about 800MB of ram, leaving 15 GB left for whatever I need to run. Which I have found is plenty for my use case, I’ve never seen swap in use.

    The MX tools are good, like everyone else has been saying here. They take away a lot of the fiddly business associated with the average “sysadmin” things that an end user needs to do.

  • rmerc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    MX is great. The MX tools are very useful and Sysvinit isn’t as difficult to use as I had assume. It runs great on an old thinkpad of mine. Seems like a very viable option for people looking to self-host on older gear.

  • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    MX Linux is a midweight, desktop-oriented Linux distribution based on Debian Stable 13 “trixie” that emphasizes stability, performance, and ease of use.

    Why not Debian directly instead of MX?

    • S1L3NT_F0X404@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I was actually on Debian for a while, but I had constant issues with it dropping my mobile hotspot connection. It required a bit too much configuration for my liking, though the installer itself was decent. ​Debian was actually my fourth distro—I’ve spent time with Lubuntu, LMDE, Fedora, and MX. After struggling with Debian for a while, I’m back on MX Linux. I’ve also experimented with Parrot OS home edition, but I’ve found that some distros just play better with mobile hotspots than others. Home internet is getting pricey, so I prefer sticking to public Wi-Fi and my hotspot for the time being.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    what do you like about it?

    i ask because i need to switch distros and i’m looking for ideas besides the usual recommendations.

    • br3d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not OP, but I’m really enjoying it because it’s light and stable, and the set of MX tools it comes with are great. Their backup tool is so good that as my old laptop started to die I was easily able to transfer my entire setup to a totally different computer and pick up exactly where I’d left off

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        … Their backup tool is so good that as my old laptop started to die I was easily able to transfer my entire setup to a totally different computer and pick up exactly where I’d left off

        you must have read my mind because this is exactly why i’m on the market for a new distro. lol

        i put fedora on my laptop w the intention that it’ll be temporary so that i’ll have something i can trust right now and knowing full well that fedora iterates quickly. their migration tool has never worked for me and now i have to update again. i’m looking for something that has a longer term iteration like debian has, but shorter than debian.

    • S1L3NT_F0X404@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s super light. Unlike Fedora or other distros I’ve tried, it doesn’t play weird with my mobile hotspot.

  • clif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I still need to try this.

    I downloaded and started seeding it when there was a post about it a few weeks back but haven’t had time to try it.

    I assume the ISO live boots from a USB so I can poke around without installing? Surely.

    I’ve got an old laptop that I kept windows on for the once every few years I had to use windows but I don’t think it’s supported anymore and I’d actually use it occasionally if I put Linux on it ;)

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    does it use Systemd or not? wikipedia was unclear :

    MX-25 “Infinity” was released on 9 November 2025 and was built on Debian 13 “trixie”.[32] Standard kernel is 6.12.43 with Liquorix 6.15 for the Advanced Hardware Support “AHS”. New is the deb822 sources format. The installer can “replace” an existing install and offers zram swap. Support for Secure Boot. KDE is version 6.3.6 with both Wayland and X11 sessions available. All releases are available with Systemd. The Xfce, Xfce-AHS, and Fluxbox releases are also available in sysVint variants.[33] MX-25.1 With the release of 25.1, Dual Init is now again possible.[34] This includes both systemd and SysVinit[35] init systems on the same ISO.[1]

    • S1L3NT_F0X404@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      During the install of MX Linux, you can choose between systemd and init. The installer actually boots up and lets you select your preference, which is a great feature. I personally went with the systemd option because I don’t know much about init, but it really comes down to personal preference.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        fantastic, ever since the Dylan debacle I was looking to at least try a non systemd distro, I will try to install it in a few months on my trashtop we use for kids vids