Dave.

What language features do users say helped them? Existence of libraries didn’t make C a good language

Hm, except in the way that being able to call into library functions “relatively easily” from the base language was a good way for others to create a bajillion handy libraries.

And once you’ve got those available to extend your language in any direction you want, you’re well on your way to ubiquitousness.

Cute graphic for the malicious package upload explaining four relatively simple steps in detail to take up 3/4 of the page, meanwhile “Opus 4.7 attacks real target and deletes records” is a single sentence in passing.

“There will be a period of change and temporary disruption. But then, after that, we will be living in utopia!”

• said every dictator ever.

It should be able to slide/rotate on top of the rubber base. It was assembled like that, with the spindle notches lining up with the holes in the base. So something has moved in the meantime to take them out of alignment.

A moderate amount of force might be needed. Eg the amount you can apply with your fingers by holding the top piece with one hand and pushing with the fingers of the other hand on the rubber base to rotate it.

You shouldn’t need to grab it with tools / pliers to move it. If you think you need tools, it’s better to stop and have a bit more of a think about it before going further.

Git is not stupid. It’s common. With markdown of course.

XKCD 2501.

Looking at your photo, rotate the spindle about 1/8th of a turn anticlockwise until the cutouts in the spindle cap align with the screws?

Always ready to try brute force first. And then some other, less palatable options if that doesn’t work, like slightly less brute force.

concatenates multiple text files into one text file / string with markers so that the individual files can be extracted out again with intact file content, path, and permissions

Sooooo like tar, with less features?

(Checks summary)

Ok, so compared to tar it is:

Human readable.

AI friendly.

Not sure if that’s much reason to use it.

That otter needs to see a boneologist, stat.

Your just not using it the Approved Apple Way™ that’s all.

/s

like the insurance won’t approve it or something like that

That’s the part that’s broken, not the concerns that you might get false negatives.

In any case, I would hope that the system would return “results inconclusive” rather than a hard no, prompting you to be put in the queue for normal diagnostics.

Australia and NZ have country wide coverage for SMS via starlink.

Australia is a huge landmass , and being able to send/receive messages just by having a view of the sky is quite significant for emergency situations.

Here is a map showing phone coverage in Australia from all providers. There’s about 5 million square kilometres with no service at all, that now has basic communications via starlink.

Qualcomm has its “IZat” system where:

- every AP’s BSSID your phone sees is sniffed by a program running continuously in the background, mapped to a latitude/longitude if possible (via GPS or any phone location means) and sent to their servers,

- So that other devices can send a list of AP BSSIDs and signal strengths and get a triangulated location within 5-10 meters.

So the server ends up with a global database of AP locations, and also the location of every device in the world using the service within ~5-10 meters.

They’ve had this in action since 2012.

In the megacities like Beijing, vehicle registration is tightly controlled to help manage congestion and pollution. EVs have more relaxed rules in those setups which provides a good incentive to get an EV.

Similar in a way to London’s congestion and ultra low emissions zones, except there the incentive is financial - you have to pay £12-15 a day to drive in them if you have the “wrong” vehicle type.

Owned by Akami now for 4 years, I think.

I’ve several small linodes and have been using the platform since 2018 or so. No difference seen so far in the linode plans or features I’m using with Akami, except for more in-depth monitoring available (for a price).

Now if you turn anything off (like that stupid autobrake that brakes for cars in the left hand turn lane beside me), they’ll use that to say “it’s not our fault, the driver turned it off!”

Don’t try and spin this as a convenient liability-limiter for manufacturers.

Unless it is an actual failure of a safety critical system, with no warning, that then directly leads to harm, manufacturers are in no way responsible for how you operate the chunk of metal and technology that you bought from them.

All this stuff absolutely helps to reduce the overall risk of injury when operating a vehicle. Is it also a pain in the ass sometimes? Sure it is. Can you turn it off? Sure you can. But sometimes that shutoff is just temporary, because governments - not manufacturers - mandate that some things are now required, because they’re sick of hosing body parts off of highways.

Why not both?

LLMs looove to commit things. Every little thing. It is handy for them as they can use commits as their own memory store that they can scan easily, but it leads to very wordy-but-minor commits.

Things that humans would just lump together in a single commit like “updated docs” gets broken into commits for every single change made over the course of a few hour session.

This is not like the days of old where television/radio/newspapers pushed their opinions to the public en masse. It’s social media, where everything is tailored to you, personally, available to you on your personal device that you carry with you everywhere 24/7, and it makes it so much harder to resist it.

That couldn’t happen with the mass media of old. It wasn’t tailored for you, so there were enough rough edges that you could stop and say “Hey, this guy’s an asshole!” and break the loop. It wasn’t with you all the time , sneaking in during that 30 second scroll of your phone when you’re bored.

Now, it’s continuous reinforcement where a tiny aspect of your profile matches a tiny part of their message, so you see it in your feed, and then it slowly cycles you through more and more of what they want you to see, until your interests match their interests and their opinions seem normal, because you see them all the time.

Brainwashing, essentially. And it’s very hard to get yourself out of it.

I don’t know what they used on the moon landing, though.

An efficient, real-time multitasking software stack on a 2MHz processor with the equivalent of ~4K of RAM and 64K of ROM.

Smart enough to handle being accidentally overloaded by its operators and still balance a spacecraft on a single engine and land on the moon while doing multiple reboots to clear its software stack. It would work its way down a list of “fly a spacecraft” tasks from critical, to informational, to just monitoring, with a certain amount of time allocated to complete the whole list. If it ran out of time, it would drop everything, perform the equivalent of a reboot with navigation parameters parked in memory, and then start again at the most critical task.

Apollo 11’s crew accidentally left their rendezvous radar (which was checking on the location of the command module in orbit) in a mode that constantly poked the computer with “pay attention to me” interrupts, and it couldn’t service the radar and run through it’s task list completely while it was on descent to the lunar surface.

To the programming team’s credit, this just caused an overload alarm a few times and the mission completed successfully.

The Apollo programmers pretty much created the whole software engineering field from scratch in the 10 years before 1969.