• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The last part is exactly what they want you to think. It WAS meant to be sufficient, but that would have cost someone else, so they invented the idea of people taking care of themselves with the 401K invention. Now when your SS doesn’t mean your needs, they can point and say, well, you should have saved up better.

    There used to be company pensions too, but they’ve slowly eroded away as younger people entered their jobs. My job gave me the option years ago of keeping the pension going or converting it to a secondary 401k that would earn lots of money, promise. I said hell no, give me my pension.

    • folekaule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But isn’t thay the reality now? Even though it wasn’t meant that way, it has been changed over the years. I’m genuinely curious. I’m not saying it should be that way, just that my understanding of how it works was that you can’t expect to get your deductions back.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        It’s not a matter of getting back what you put in, but to be able to not worry about supporting your basic needs in the last part of life. That many have paid into the system their entire working life and it isn’t enough without some extra supplement suggests it’s not working well enough.