• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It shouldn’t be controversial to think mel Gibson things suck and that he should go away.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That would be a pretty brain-dead take if you’re familiar with his actual filmic history, and I say that as someone who’s never been a personal fan of his.

      Enjoy your meaningless upvotes, though.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        An antisemite who hasn’t made a movie worth a shit in 20+ years can eat shit, and so can anyone who sticks up for him.

        • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Haha, nice little narrative twist, there.

          Oh well, enjoy your burning, righteous toxicity.

          so can anyone who sticks up for him.

          Once again a perfectly massive misreading of my entire set of points. I.e. Jews are some of the most awesome people I know, but Zionists…? Not so much.

          You and your ridiculous whitewashing of anything that doesn’t meet your exact standards is just… unfortunate to me, and always will be.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I have no idea what you’re talking about but you definitely stood up for mel Gibson as one of these “it is required to separate the art from the artist” bullshit arguments. No one knows wtf you’re babbling about other than that.

            • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              No one knows

              Ah… good ol’ weasel-words, is it not?
              (psst-- do you also paint your face orange in imitation?)

              “it is required to separate the art from the artist” bullshit arguments.

              Yeap! That’s the core argument right there. Well-recognised. And if you’re on the other side… yeah, I get it.

              Problem…?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Are you high? Do you think I’m someone else?

                Absolutely no one is required to separate art from artist and you telling me that may as well be you telling me to like a food I dislike. It’s idiotic.