Oh shit you’re right. I said that but meant the opposite lol

Which is what I’m agreeing with…?

Mercurially

Huh, I got a PC in 1997 with a 2GB hard drive. It didn’t take long (a year or so) for that to start feeling small compared to others my friend had. He got an 8 GB HD in probably 1998 and a 20 GB shortly after. It was ram I remember being so small. That PC I mentioned from 97 had 24 MB RAM which was good in 1997. It took a couple of years for anyone I knew to exceed 64 MB.

This is similar to what I’ve experienced too but don’t be surprised if someone tells you that it’s impossible for windows to use less ram than Linux. There’s one of those people in every thread.

This post is trolling us into asking that

Yeah I’m sure you’ve never heard that wishing death on someone makes you a worse person. Because there’s just definitely no truth to that at all.

What the fuck is up with your brain?

That’s true. Sorry if I was defensive.

Alright. You realize I can be annoyed by things right? That’s all I said. Not unreasonable at all. Maybe this woman has been treated bad, sure. Forgive me that if people annoy me, I don’t care to dive into their troubles in order to be sympathetic. I’m just disinterested in all of it.

You can pretend to not understand what I’m saying, fine.

You don’t need to ask this. You know what I’m saying. I’m not going to participate in you trying to excuse what you’re doing.

And? One counter example is not going to change my mind when I previously looked at her post history and out of like 8-10 posts all but one were overtly sexual and the one that wasn’t was her “randomly” mentioning her morning activity involves a bikini. Something no one would mention like that without that purpose. Regardless I’ve blocked her again and apparently will need to keep doing so. It’s not a situation where I’m hating on women which seems to be what you’re implying. I’ve blocked other people for being similarly annoying. And it’s not worth mentioning if they don’t keep coming back. Which violet has…

when she’s being horny.

That’s her only mode as far as I can tell. Even when she’s supposedly not being horny she randomly mentions wearing a bikini. It’s not fooling anyone lol

If I don’t hear or see them, how do they affect me, precisely?

So you don’t believe in subtlety or that you might ever miss something. Yikes.

EVERY SINGLE HUMAN ALIVE reacts the same to advertising.

That’s pretty insane and obviously no one is even remotely claiming that. If that were true then every ad campaign would have either a 100% success or failure rate. Given that you could just use a focus single person to try things out on, then every single ad campaign would work on every human. Tell me who is claiming this?

Yes I’m extremely “overconfident” because I claim that both you and I can be manipulated. Something so obviously true it’s silly id ever need to say it.

Interesting. Every time I saw anyone complaining about her constantly posting sexual stuff, several people would come to her defense. Guess I have to keep blocking her.

Also this is her third account I’m aware of in maybe 2 months.

I have a feeling that overconfidence is an issue for you

So is this the same woman I’ve blocked twice now for awkward horny posts? Is she getting banned, or what? I don’t understand why the same person keeps coming back into my timeline even after multiple block attempts.

Lol dude this is ridiculous. What one doesn’t expect is to be influenced by ads. So yeah, that’s one of the very few good points you make.

Standing up for confidently incorrect individuals is a silly waste of time. We all see and hear thousands of ads per year no matter how many we block. It is absurd to suggest that there are people who could be exposed to that much psychological manipulation and remain entirely unaffected.