

I appreciate that. It is indeed a problem that people don’t learn things for themselves, but in this case I wasn’t planning to accept any response as gospel. It was more of a poorly communicated “did I miss something?”


I appreciate that. It is indeed a problem that people don’t learn things for themselves, but in this case I wasn’t planning to accept any response as gospel. It was more of a poorly communicated “did I miss something?”


Thank you. This is exactly the answer I was hoping for ^


Right. My question probably should have been “is this based on something he actually said or just a weird joke that I wouldn’t get?”
I guess I have to caveat my phrasing even when it’s super obvious what was meant. Everyone knows you could’ve found a single example of a vegan doing something bizarre, yet it wouldn’t be remotely relevant unless it were at least a semi-popular trend.
Hint: “everyone” in this comment doesn’t literally mean every human in existence.


I know how to search the Internet but believe or not if someone posts something which may or may not be real, either they can respond accordingly or someone else easily can, as you just proved.
So there exists some group using a weird metaphor, and somehow that is just as representative of vegans as a video of how farming works is of farmers…?


Did he actually say this…?
If I have seen that, it wasn’t a charity I’ve heard of, to my knowledge. Are you in the US?
I agree with your last line, but I wouldn’t even be that mad about them taking credit if in the end, the money truly helped people and verifiably so. But when I see it, it’s always “would you like to donate to needy families?” Making you the bad guy for saying no and denying all transparency here.
I don’t think they ever disclose which charity the money goes to. That’s the real problem here. I don’t think it would be a bad thing at all to encourage small donations like that, I just have no trust my money is going somewhere I’d approve of.
Super intelligence on display.
“this image clearly shows weirder things than any vegan does”


True, and that’s a bad practice to take part in! If it’s something that actively runs and consumes resources, one should keep around only if needed.


Bloat isn’t “software I chose and spent time installing and configuring”


That’s true, but tech companies seem to get special treatment. Example: Uber created an enormous fleet of illegal taxis. But it was through an app, so it was fine.
Edit: lol at the downvote


That post title reads like nerdy mad libs


He knows that tech ceos can commit crimes whenever they like


The rerelease on steam is probably the right route. You meant that one right? It is basically just like the original but with some minor and welcome improvements. I would suggest turning off the accessibility features though, unless you need them.
Nazis leave here
What I dislike about the overview is that it takes over the whole screen and also feels a little sluggish. I like the ulauncher loads really quickly and on top of the current UI, blocking virtually nothing from view. Also I like having a few bells and whistles that ulauncher has, like the ability to type a quick math problem and it functions like a basic calculator.
edit: I just realized that I’m mislabeling the thing I dislike. It’s the “show all applications” feature in reality. I use overview a lot just to keep track of what I have open, and I like it, but it serves a different purpose than what I want, which is just a very quick and unobtrusive way to launch an app not on the dock.