Right, but the question of “what’s the catch” frames it as a bad thing, so it’s not incorrect to assume that the answer is a bad thing, especially if the answer doesn’t frame it as a good thing
But I’m just arguing semantics, and nothing I said actually matters.
They were asking what the bad news is, though.
Sometimes there is no bad news but an explanation.
Right, but the question of “what’s the catch” frames it as a bad thing, so it’s not incorrect to assume that the answer is a bad thing, especially if the answer doesn’t frame it as a good thing
But I’m just arguing semantics, and nothing I said actually matters.
I’m fine with there being no catch and everybody gaining. They shouldn’t have to strike for it though.