“I don’t know if that’s the point of the discussion,” Farber said.
It’s not, but it is related to a far more important one.
The current discussion is if a watermelon pin is appropriate attire for a professional. The larger, more important discussion is “What causes are appropriate for someone to publicly support?”, and further “Who gets to decide what causes are approved?”
Those are all born of the same unasked question: Why is admin so focused on continuing to undermine staff support of marginalized & vulnerable communities when that’s exactly what hospitals are for!?
Isn’t it though?
An analogy about the discussion isn’t the point of the discussion? No shit.
deleted by creator
It’s not, but it is related to a far more important one.
The current discussion is if a watermelon pin is appropriate attire for a professional. The larger, more important discussion is “What causes are appropriate for someone to publicly support?”, and further “Who gets to decide what causes are approved?”
Those are all born of the same unasked question: Why is admin so focused on continuing to undermine staff support of marginalized & vulnerable communities when that’s exactly what hospitals are for!?
Oh, right. The shareholders. 🖕🏼
The shareholders of the Ontario Medical Association? I guess those would be the taxpayers of Ontario, maybe. Or the doctors perhaps.
My bad. Was a little stoned and got a little lost. 🙏🏼😅
It is, they’re just evil.