I definitely care if my doctor is some anti-abortion, patriarchal Christian who votes Conservative, but I hardly doubt wearing a cross or not would indicate their inability to fulfill their role as a physician because of those values.
Either way, a political criticism of genocide is not the same thing as a general religious symbol, so there’s no consistency between these cases in the first place. Everything your doctor subscribes to is rooted in their politics, and a watermelon pin that shows solidarity with a nation currently victimized by genocide is like, a pretty bad starting point for this enforcement against political expression.
Which doctor though? The one you see every now and then to discuss your health trends and medication needs, or the one that’s straddling you on a gurney giving you CPR while you’re being rushed from an ambulance to an OR?
If the argument is meant to be, “you wouldn’t care if they were saving your life,” then you don’t seem to really understand why I wouldn’t want a bigoted doctor that wants me genocided. This mentality is fundamently incompatible with empathy as it requires the selective dehumanization of particular groups for one’s own material benefit; the suspension of empathy. Yes, I want my fucking paramedic to have a sense of empathy and I do believe that quality is crucial in order for them to perform their job effectively. Just like how I’d be endangered by a family physician neglecting my needs due to bigotry, I wouldn’t even be a statistical anomaly if my paramedic treated me differently because of bigotry and I fucking died for no good reason.
“Radicals” who? Hijabis? Orthodox Jewish men? They wouldn’t be radical to refuse and it’d be difficult to write a law that applies to wearing a cross that wouldn’t just overwhelmingly be enforced against groups whose religious symbols aren’t optional.
I definitely care if my doctor is some anti-abortion, patriarchal Christian who votes Conservative, but I hardly doubt wearing a cross or not would indicate their inability to fulfill their role as a physician because of those values.
Either way, a political criticism of genocide is not the same thing as a general religious symbol, so there’s no consistency between these cases in the first place. Everything your doctor subscribes to is rooted in their politics, and a watermelon pin that shows solidarity with a nation currently victimized by genocide is like, a pretty bad starting point for this enforcement against political expression.
Which doctor though? The one you see every now and then to discuss your health trends and medication needs, or the one that’s straddling you on a gurney giving you CPR while you’re being rushed from an ambulance to an OR?
That’d be EMS.
If the argument is meant to be, “you wouldn’t care if they were saving your life,” then you don’t seem to really understand why I wouldn’t want a bigoted doctor that wants me genocided. This mentality is fundamently incompatible with empathy as it requires the selective dehumanization of particular groups for one’s own material benefit; the suspension of empathy. Yes, I want my fucking paramedic to have a sense of empathy and I do believe that quality is crucial in order for them to perform their job effectively. Just like how I’d be endangered by a family physician neglecting my needs due to bigotry, I wouldn’t even be a statistical anomaly if my paramedic treated me differently because of bigotry and I fucking died for no good reason.
The radicals would not accept to remove their religious gear, that’s part of the point.
“Radicals” who? Hijabis? Orthodox Jewish men? They wouldn’t be radical to refuse and it’d be difficult to write a law that applies to wearing a cross that wouldn’t just overwhelmingly be enforced against groups whose religious symbols aren’t optional.