bleustenns@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 20 days agoWhat reasons do people have for disliking SELinux?message-squaremessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up160file-text
arrow-up160message-squareWhat reasons do people have for disliking SELinux?bleustenns@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 20 days agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepapercut@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·19 days agoHaving your home directory on a different disk is something that could’ve saved me a lot of headache. Can’t believe I didn’t think of that.
minus-squareSoot [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-219 days agoIn a lot of distros at least, you can just reinstall in place, which has the same effect. But a different place for /home does feel a potentially more reliable method.
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 days agoI think it’s becoming default on more and more Linux installers
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 days agoIt used to be. I think it changed at some point to make installs easier for new people who were used to only having a single C:.
minus-squareplutopos@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 hours agoFedora still does it (and it uses btrfs subvolumes, so they’re resizable)
Having your home directory on a different disk is something that could’ve saved me a lot of headache. Can’t believe I didn’t think of that.
In a lot of distros at least, you can just reinstall in place, which has the same effect. But a different place for /home does feel a potentially more reliable method.
I think it’s becoming default on more and more Linux installers
It used to be. I think it changed at some point to make installs easier for new people who were used to only having a single C:.
Fedora still does it (and it uses btrfs subvolumes, so they’re resizable)