gnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoSloupinfosec.pubimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1617
arrow-up1617imageSloupinfosec.pubgnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 days agoThey didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoyes. normal usage works as expected
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoYes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
They didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
Does that really make a difference?
yes. normal usage works as expected
Yes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.