• DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I do continue to say it. Are pedophiles representative of the USA? They voted one in and still have him there after the abundant evidence that he contributed to the abuse and trafficking of girls and underage young women. I’ll agree that Nazis are representative of Ukraine if you agree that pedophiles are representative of good ol’ 'Murica.

    • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes I would. Pedophiles and murders are absolutely representative of the US government lmao you don’t think they are? Amerika has been the most evil empire on earth since 1949. Raping pillaging and genociding across the world from the banana republics to Gaza to Jakarta.

      • DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah, OK. I rolled the dice on that one. Didn’t realise you would so easily agree. I think I see that we just have different views on whether a country represents the ideals of one or a smaller number of actors, whether or not they have made their way to the higher echelons of government. It’s clear that we’re not going to see eye to eye on this. Thanks for the exchange though.

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not thankful you’ve been nothing but an aggressive petulant child caping for Nazis because you hate Russia.

          • DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s fair. To be honest I started with the theory that you were a bot or some pro-Russian propaganda tool. Now I believe you’re human I’d like apologise for the aggression. You didn’t deserve that.

            • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              pro-ukraine/pro-NATO bots outnumber pro-Russia bots at about a ratio of 10:1 by the way, even per western sources. It’s way more likely that any liberal pro-western person you talk to online is a bot than a “tankie” commie will be. Bots don’t tend to take extremely unpopular positions like communism, communists do. they try to fit in and act ‘normal’, they don’t die on principled hills. they also tend to target large userbases like on reddit or youtube, not tiny little lemmy subforums with 10 readers

              • DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Where are you getting your information for this? I’m not about to take this idea onboard cause some guy on the internet told me and he really sounded like he meant it.

                • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  In the English language community, there are 100,084 nodes and 573,885 edges, where there are 57.72% pro-Ukraine bots, 31.58% pro-Ukraine humans, 7.49% pro-Russia bots, and 3.21% pro-Russia humans

                  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00528-y#%3A~%3Atext=In+the+English+language+community%2C3.21%25+pro-Russia+humans.

                  7.5 : 1 ratio, not 10:1, sorry for the slight mistake there. Most of the pro-russia english bots are also on the conservative side, not the leftist side.

                  • DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Credit where credit’s due. That is a source. Just not quite for what I understand you are stating. This study was published in 2025, and used an internal Chinese university funding source in the year 2023/4. It is exclusively looking at Twitter (X) and Reddit posts about the Bucha massacre which took place in April 2022.

                    You appear to have taken elements of this study and are extrapolating it to reinforce a unilateral world view for all time that bears little association with the original research.

                    I ask you to note that genuine scientific research always starts from a position of openness to new information. This would be true if the study was repeated for a new topic today.