I liked some of what he said around focusing on applications across industries e.g. save fertilizer in farming, decrease diagnostic time in healthcare. I liked the talk about enacting privacy legislation.
I did not like how for everything he said about sovereign AI infra ended with “and if we fail to do it ourselves we’ll buy it” (from you know who.) I didn’t hear any contingency plan for tackling potential rising unemployment as a result of AI integration. Seems like they’re betting on the AI-creates-more-jobs-than-it-destroys scenario.
He did not address the question about losing sovereignty by embedding US tech into our economy, e.g. what happens if the US turns off our AI access at a point when our economy is reliant on it.
Ultimately I’m very skeptical even though I think there’s genuine potential for social benefit from productively applying AI where it makes sense. I’m skeptical that this bunch would deliver those social benefits. I think they’re likely to deliver benefits to capital/business from instead of working Canadians. I’d be happy to be wrong.
What did you think about it?


AI is like the invention of the calculator in how it will ultimately change our lives, IMO. But yeah, let’s go balls deep into it and destroy our planet, siphon up our water, drain our power grid, and pollute our air with infrasound.
Cool plan bro.