• turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s a fire prevention thing to keep doors closed, if a fire breaks out when you’re asleep it really can make the difference in you surviving it. But, the cats aren’t going to let me do that, so we all go down together.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      But that is why here in Belgium it is mandated that doors have a minimum gap for ventilation while also keeping the door closed and also outside ventilation

    • placebo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Is there data to support this? I imagine if a fire breaks out in an apartment and I don’t wake up in time, I’m fucked anyway. Hopefully smoke detectors in all rooms will do their job.

        • akwd169@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Bro literally asks for “data to support this”

          So I guess they wanted someone to say

          yeah theres data to support this, trustmebro™

          And thats it

          Because usually people looking for DATA would use the internet search function, NOT expect verbal responses which DO NOT constitute data

          I dont understand all the idiots downvoting you because I wouldve done the same thing

          You want data, search the web

          You want anectdotes, talk on a forum

          Its annoying when people expect to be spoonfed credible data on a forum rather than taking 5 seconds to find it themselves (and sharing it, imagine that, fucking utopic) instead of someone else spending double that time finding it and writing a comment with sources in reply (thats called spoonfeeding)

          But hey here comes the airplane I guess

          • moncharleskey@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It blows my mind that people will take safety advice from a random comment, question it, and expect another random comment to clarify for them, especially in a platform as small as Lemmy. It’s so alien a thought process to me that I can’t understand it, but it makes it easier to see how misinformation spreads so easily.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            “Hey, you seem to know something about this, is there anything specific I can look for to learn more instead of starting from zero?”

                • moncharleskey@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Is there data to support this? I imagine if a fire breaks out in an apartment and I don’t wake up in time, I’m fucked anyway. Hopefully smoke detectors in all rooms will do their job.

                  I don’t see a request for feedback. I see someone asking for data from a commenter, saying they were probably fucked either way, and hoping smoke detectors would help. The only request was for supporting data, and why would you trust “data” from a random commenter?

        • placebo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Why are you on an online forum if communicating with other people is such a burden for you? lol

          • Surp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I hate when people say Google it bro we’re here to interact with each other and pass knowledge

          • moncharleskey@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Are you asking for anecdotes or information? Because it would’ve taken less time for you to search than for me to search, write a comment, and post a link. Why are you on the internet if you want other people to read for you? Good on you to attack me for your laziness.

            • Starik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              33 minutes ago

              I’m with you on this one. The way they rudely asked that question, then forced you to look up the answer and post the link. It should be illegal.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I think they were looking for a conversation. If saving time is the goal, we wouldn’t be here in the first place.

            • protist@retrofed.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Bro, no one was attacking here until you rolled up and attacked. You weren’t even the person they responded to. You could’ve said and done nothing and no one would have ever known or cared. Instead, you decided to cause a scene.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              They weren’t asking you to search, they were asking if you the person they responded to knew anything off the top of your their head.

              • placebo@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I also explained my viewpoint and expected to hear what they think, i.e. tried to have a normal conversation. But we’re on the internet, so yeah…