• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You have a rough point, but a $20k delta is too much. Thankfully, the comparison is between a “special” car and a boring workhorse, so the price delta isn’t reflective of the practical choices. 7-passenger PV5 looks to be about $50k, so less than $10k delta between a Sienna and a comparable EV van. Still a pretty big gap, especially to take up front, but closer to reasonable given your reasons. We are seeing the gap close more aggressively in the 5-passenger segment, but 3-row still has been focused on EV only for ‘premium’ experience.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Lack of noise and emissions, instant torque control, and the possibility to charge at home are indeed premium experiences. A lot of ICE pushers are trying to get a free lunch here.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sure, those are premium things, but don’t actually drive the manufacturer’s cost as those come mostly for free.

        So it drives bigger margin for them instead, but at the expense of people perceiving EV as somehow fundamentally too expensive.

        • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          They’re inherent in the battery system. The manufacturer’s costs are in the battery. Propulsion, silence, no-emissions, instant torque, and home charging are the features we get with a battery whether we like it or not (no downside really). Price-wise, there is no point in talking about them separately. ICE pushers apparently forget the other features of the package. Manufactures must obviously charge a price for the package.