Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
Yoti is a British company headquartered in London that operates age verification and digital identity services
Don’t the Brits have very strong defamation laws? Seems like an easy lawsuit to win.
I mean… GrapheneOS is here to do exactly the opposite of that. Lol. I mean… Fuck Yoti but like ¯\(ツ)/¯
deleted by creator
Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
deleted by creator
You are correct I believe. My understanding was that graphene blocked an api or something like that to address the vulnerability…?
deleted by creator
Okay I’m just gonna say it. So what?
deleted by creator
I see what you’re saying. I’m partial to Graphene but I am picking up what you’re putting down.
deleted by creator
I’m not opposed to old school devices but realistically they’re impractical in today’s world.
I used to use flip phones. While cheap, too much of the world expects you to have a smartphone.
Well that explains a lot. Fucking nanny state.
deleted by creator