• bitfucker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    The alternative to a less complex web is we will have more native applications. And honestly, I do not prefer that

    • kibblebits@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      That doesn’t need to be the case. Yes, there is a place for a “web app” with advanced tech, but most of the web isn’t a web app.

      And, regarding native apps, that’s why there are downloadable web apps made in Wails, Tauri, or that disgusting Electron.

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I assume you are one of those people that wants the web to go back to the 2000 era. Where JS is not as wide spread and multimedia is expensive to load. That’s why I assume if you want the web to be simpler you advocate for removing many of the current web standards/API. I meet too many people like that hence my immediate assumption

        • kibblebits@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 days ago

          I am not who you think I am. I also never said half of that. You seem like the type who likes to gaslight and imagine conversations.

          • bitfucker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Naah, I do not have imaginary conversation. Those are what many people I speak on some discord server actually say when they talk about the web being too complex. While they used discord. And many people at that. That’s why I jump to the assumptions, my bad then.