Enforcing a ban also presents additional privacy risks, experts add.

Under the Australian law, platforms looking to verify a user’s age can either request copies of identification documents, use a third party to apply age estimation technology to an account holder’s face, or make inferences from data already available such has how long an account has been held.

Michael Geist, a professor and Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa, said that potential data collection alone is concerning and would need to apply to all social media users regardless of age to be effective.

He noted that it can be difficult to discern between a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old by appearance alone, whether in person or online through biometrics systems.

“So what those systems tend to do then is dig deeper,” he said. “They look at who your friend circle is or the language that you use when posting to try to make a better guess.

“Well, now they’re literally engaging in increased surveillance in order to try (to identify your age), and raising even more privacy concerns in order pull this together.”

  • PlzGibHugs@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Yes, but again, at that point the government will prosecute anyone who opposes them. Giving corporations a couple minor defenses doesn’t remove the government’s power, it just helps shift the blame to the masses rather than large corporations who are likely complicit with the government.