• ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 天前

    Limited time sales is not what’s being talked about. Those are allowed.

    It’s the regular pricing. A game listed on steam needs to make up for their 30% cut. Some other sites take a smaller cut. But multiple game companies have found that trying to list their games on non-steam key selling websites, for less money (because they don’t have to make up for as big a cut) are getting threatened to have their games removed from Steam for doing so. This is well outside any clause in Steam TOS, and would be illegal even if it was covered.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 天前

      But multiple game companies have found that trying to list their games on non-steam key selling websites, for less money (because they don’t have to make up for as big a cut) are getting threatened to have their games removed from Steam for doing so.

      Has any of these claims been proven yet?

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 天前

        They’re still working their way through the courts.

        One of them is over two years old, though, so it’s not just a clout chaser blowing hot air based on absolutely nothing.

        • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 天前

          One of them is over two years old

          Which only proves my point. They allegedly do, and we yet to discover if they actually do it or Epic, Ubisoft and whatever another publisher are lying. 2 years to prove if Valve was abusing the system and still nothing out there to confirm this suspicion.

          I suspect that is really tough to prove and that is why eventually case will be dropped due to lack of evidence.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 小时前

              Have you seriously never heard of the Nintendo v Palworld cases? Those are still going on after 2 years despite Nintendo’s claims being complete bullshit

            • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 天前

              Court case with undeniable and sufficient evidence also doesnt last long. There is more to the story than “they do it/they dont do it”

              But claiming they do before it has been proven is dumb.

              • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 天前

                Defending a company with multiple unrelated entities suing them over the same thing, including non competitors, before they’ve been proven to NOT be doing that thing is very stupid.

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 天前

                  with multiple unrelated entities suing them

                  How do we know they’re really unrelated? A lot of the lawsuits are in the US, where bribery lobbying is very prevalent, and the lawsuits brought forth by private entities could be backed by Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, Epic, etc. under the table. Hell, any publisher/developer involved in the ESA is by definition not “unrelated”.

                  Until these lawsuits are fully resolved, nothing has been proven. All we have are claims and speculation at the moment.