• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Nope. That’s not at all what happened here.

    I found a meme elsewhere which I thought was funny, posted it with a headline that’s neutral towards the grifter since him being shitty is beside the point, and then answered in the affirmative when people pointed out that he sucks.

    Go touch some grass until you stop hallucinating, please.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      “I mean, I DON’T like that kind of stuff, unless you all think is cool and then like, yeah, I really do like it. Or whatever.”

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You’re really blazing the path for the aspiring, “I want to post ambiguous, affectionate memes of objectively bad people with no context of their evil” crowd.

          Up next is four AI-generated panels of Tucker Carlson petting farm animals with the title, “Damn dog… This dude really on some olde MacDonald vibes or what!”

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            ambiguous

            True

            affectionate

            False

            objectively bad people

            True

            no context of their evil

            True, as it was irrelevant to the video game reference which was the funny part.

            Up next is four AI-generated panels of Tucker Carlson petting farm animals

            Damn, you’re really letting that imagination condemnation run wild, huh?

            Maybe make the next drink water…