grumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago📡📡📡thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square176fedilinkarrow-up1731
arrow-up1731image📡📡📡thelemmy.clubgrumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square176fedilink
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoThe implication of the way you said it is that there an underlying chemical/biological cause that could be addressed with a chemical/biological solution; I don’t think the arrow of causality points in that direction.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours ago“the implication of the way you said it” is gold, i’m stealing that
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoAnd just two days ago someone responded to my comment with, “No offense, but were you on drugs when you wrote that?”
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoIf I start doing drugs, will I make more sense?
The implication of the way you said it is that there an underlying chemical/biological cause that could be addressed with a chemical/biological solution; I don’t think the arrow of causality points in that direction.
“the implication of the way you said it” is gold, i’m stealing that
And just two days ago someone responded to my comment with, “No offense, but were you on drugs when you wrote that?”
i mean that’s also applicable
If I start doing drugs, will I make more sense?
probably depends on the drug.