• undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the more philosophical issue is that there is a class of people who are the “owners” and a class who are the “users”.

    The “owners” have a whole ton of power over what we use. When ownership was decentralized, so was the power.

    We’re talking about games here, but this can generalize to do many other things.

    • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They did exactly that already actually when they brought up cars and housing.

      Generational wealth through ownership.

      They, themselves say they have a collection of the past they’ll cherish. But should anyone else want to collect something like that, oh no, it’s worthless when they’re dead, so you shouldn’t have the ability to own it like I do.

      Literally pulling the ladder up after they benefitted. Just like on housing. On vehicles. Now on games.