I like to use these shortcuts as the perfect example to show that it is perfectly fine for sites to offer different, alternative, functionality based on what the platform and input method can offer:
- Got touch? Great, you can now swipe and pinch-zoom on things.
- Got a keyboard? Great, you can focus elements by tabbing into them.
- Got a pointer device? Great, things can now happen on hover.
- Using a keyboard? Great, you can use handy shortcuts.
A practical example here is a modal dialog that is getting shown: depending on which platform and input mechanism combo you are using, you can close it by flinging it away, hitting the ESC key, doing a back swipe, tapping the backdrop, or by activating the close button.
This is an interesting point about input methods and devices, but I’m still not entirely convinced that this shows much more than the idea that users should have multiple ways to accomplish the same thing. I’m less comfortable with the idea that some users with some devices simply cannot reach the same functions as some users with some other devices, even if using what they’d consider to be a full featured, up to date browser.
This also feels like it should ideally be additive, so when something is present you add interactions to existing elements, not modify them, not create new or remove old ones
In the sense of “just send me some files and I’ll display them on my screen” one could say yes all websites should function exactly the same, but then again, what if the screen I’m seeing the website on is a 90’s beeper?
Bramus is part of the Chrome Developer Relations team at Google
Thank you google but no thank you.
The blog post raises real issues and discussion, and it’s fair to see this as an individual’s belief (formed and shaped through experiences that predate this person working at Google, and probably predating the launch of Google Chrome to begin with).
That’s subjective opinion. The post is from 2 days ago and it’s very picky on things like it’s touching mobile but don’t say that those gestures were invented way before iphone even existed or was in plans. Iphone was able to support gestures due to multi touch screen. If author thinks iphone was revolutionary then I can’t disagree more. Same with picture in picture and other stuff that he mentions.
The fact that author is working at Google is making this stuff even more subjective.
