A new NYT analysis found that anyone shorter than 5-foot-6 — about half of American adults — would frequently be knocked to the ground in front of today's average vehicle.
No, that’s a logical fallacy, and you are using another one called a strawman. It’s common knowledge in the industry the epa created large vehicles. It’s not even disputed except here on lemmy for some reason
I’m sorry I wasn’t even aware that the EPA made vehicles. That’s disappointing to hear that they were single-handedly responsible for making all these large fuel inefficient vehicles.
Or maybe…. There was a rule made to prevent a problem that the infallible Free Market couldn’t solve. Then the mfgs found a loophole to exploit.
Who upvotes this shit
People who work in environmental compliance. I worked for carb for 10 yrs
Just goes to show you can do something without learning.
“Mackerel are fish and thus all fish are mackerel.” -krisevol probably
No, that’s a logical fallacy, and you are using another one called a strawman. It’s common knowledge in the industry the epa created large vehicles. It’s not even disputed except here on lemmy for some reason
I’m sorry I wasn’t even aware that the EPA made vehicles. That’s disappointing to hear that they were single-handedly responsible for making all these large fuel inefficient vehicles.
Or maybe…. There was a rule made to prevent a problem that the infallible Free Market couldn’t solve. Then the mfgs found a loophole to exploit.
Nah, it’s probably the first one.
Your are the only one that thinks the epa didn’t cause large vehicles. Just Google “suv loophole” and get some free knowledge.
The policy had good intentions, but failed miserably. But keep defending a policy even the policy makers admit was a mistake.
Sorry, but you’re coming across as “well what was she wearing?”
Nice try though.
Your insite on this topic is amazing and we are all better of for it.
What about large who worked for proteins?
Usually large works for carb.