• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    No That is like saying that outlawing a cancerous die in fruit juice but not in lemonade lead to unhealthier diet because lemonades were exempted and remained exempted even when it became obvious that there was a huge loophole.

    You say, the problem was that they outlawed that cancerous substance in fruit juice, rather than that the problem was that authorities failed to include lemonades in that ban and insisted on not expanding it either. That is not the same because your position implies one should not ban that cancerous substance because that only pushes lemonade sales.

    The problem is not too much regulation it is deleberitely or by incompetence, too little regulation (vast exemptions)

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No regulation is a problem, and incorrect regulation is also a problem. Both led to terrible outcomes.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That I can agree with. But in this concrete case, the regulation on cars was not what was off, it was the lack of extension of that regulation on oversized personal vehicles, ie private SUVs and pickup trucks. That is a key difference.