Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 hours agoDiscovery phaselemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1439
arrow-up1439imageDiscovery phaselemmy.dbzer0.comUnpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 hours ago I guess I’m an old. No, you’re right: afab and amab should only be used in contexts in which it is actually important information. E.g. medical. In all other cases it is unnecessary.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 hours agoThe presence of a prostate is relevant here though
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoBut that’s not what the original comment wrote. The presence of a prostate might be relevant, the assigned gender at birth is not.
minus-squarexkbx@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoNah youre right it was the wrong term
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 hour agoI’m happy that we agree, but there was no need to delete your comment :)
No, you’re right: afab and amab should only be used in contexts in which it is actually important information. E.g. medical. In all other cases it is unnecessary.
The presence of a prostate is relevant here though
But that’s not what the original comment wrote. The presence of a prostate might be relevant, the assigned gender at birth is not.
Nah youre right it was the wrong term
I’m happy that we agree, but there was no need to delete your comment :)