Daniel Berntsson, founder of Mullvad, gave a personal donation of 5 million SEK (roughly 450,000€) in 2025 to Örebropartiet. This enormous donation accounted for 72% of the party’s revenue in 2025.

How does this affect Mullvad’s legitimacy as a company advocating for a free and open internet, while also funding a political party whose agenda seem to contradict these values? The official party website (in Swedish) can be found via the link below.

https://orebropartiet.se/om-oss/

        • anar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          “Authoritarian” is type of government, which Anarchists oppose.

          If you define “government” just as a way of organising society, then Anarchists want a decentralised, non-hierarchical “government”.

          If you define “government” as a hierarchical institution with centralised power, anarchists don’t want that.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            So, in essence, opposition to authority is opposition to hierarchy, right? What about instances where hierarchy is less a matter of class interest and more of logistical necessity? Why the opposition to collectivization, and instead a push towards communalization?

            I’m a Marxist-Leninist, and a former anarchist, so I’m aware of how I used to personally think, more wondering what you’re specifically thinking of here.

            • anar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Ah okay, the original question made me think you’re new to this and need basic introduction. You’re obviously well familiar with the terms!