• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You are purposely choosing to ignore the context in which the original statement was made, so that you can paint it as unfounded.

    That’s either pure intellectual dishonesty, or an exemplary demonstration of being incapable of logical thought, either of which seems to place you squarely in the demographic being targeted in this thread.

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You are purposely choosing to ignore the context in which the original statement was made, so that you can paint it as unfounded.

      False. I’m simply saying that @homes@piefed.world statement applies to more than just conservatives… That’s all. Not that it doesn’t apply to conservatives at all, especially when referred back to OP’s post…

      It’s literally not even a fighting statement but a simple reference to the cooked state of American political parties. It’s not that deep my friend.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s a distinction without a difference.

        If you’re looking to refute a point, then commit to it and argue properly. If you’re trying to make a different point, then state it and provide your reasoning.

        You did neither.