• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m having difficulty parsing this. Are you saying “we should ban religions from coercive headgear” or “we shouldn’t ban clothing”? Cause those are contradictory positions and I’m not certain what you’re trying to say (which is probably entirely on me)

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Ban anyone for coercing someone into or out of clothing.

      Granted, I haven’t put a major amount of thought into the nuance, but the idea of making it a sin for some people to legally go outside is absurd.

      The approach of these laws makes it so the victims of mistreatment are the ones breaking the law.

      It’s like making it illegal to be homeless or illegal to have been mugged. It’s fucking outlandish.