• PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    if someone is uneducated about what food labels mean and which ones have a regulatory definition and which ones don’t

    Yeah you just described 95% of Americans, maybe more, thanks for illustrating my point! “They” (read: A politician) chose to use a word that already has specific implications for that market, which they absolutely didn’t need to do and, imo, they almost certainly did on purpose. I don’t like that, sorry 🤷‍♂️

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait what politician is using the word in this context? I must have missed something.

      And just because loads of people are ignorant and uneducated doesn’t mean we should abandon words just because they can be misunderstood. It was a weak point.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was referring to the politician in charge of the USDA when they decided to redefine a scientific term for no other determinable reason than to make more money. Loads of people being ignorant and uneducated enough to misunderstand advertising is exactly the reason we have and need strong consumer protection regulations, like antitrust and fair competition laws.

        Idk what the last sentence is referencing or I’d address it, sorry.