• PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anderson early in the exchange sadly looking down at his notes, as he begins to understand that things aren’t going to proceed along the rails that he wanted, is absolutely perfect to behold.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m reporting you for voter fraud lol. There are four upvotes on your comment that are pretty suspect, including at least one that comes from an account that has a history of obvious clumsy voter fraud. I’ll put details in the report.

            • demeaning_casually@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Imagine being such a perpetually online loser that you closely monitor upvotes and actually spend at least a hour reporting people for upvoting the people they follow when they agree with them?

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Dude, we are both internet weirdos. You make multiple accounts and upvote your own comments (looks like it could be in the range of hundreds of times that you did that). That’s a kind of internet weirdness that would never occur to me to do. It’s extremely weird. On the other hand, I dig through the database sometimes if it seems something is sketchy, looking for people who are faking votes to manipulate public opinion on Lemmy. We’re both weird. Own it.

                • demeaning_casually@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  This is so weird.

                  You’re attributing votes from close personal friends that I convinced to move to the fediverse with me as “vote manipulation”. That’s actually sad, dude.

                  Is it because you can’t imagine having a group of friends? or what? I’d be happy to be your friend if you stopped being so weird!

            • sqgl@beehaw.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              demesisx is the same person who you are accusing in this thread (demening_casually)? Certainly the usernames are similar.

              Or are you just demonstrating that you can produce similar evidence if needed?

              “demeaning casually” certainly describes their unacceptable behavior.

              You failed to notice that demesisx made some comments at exactly the same time (to the second), which implies automation. That in intake is extremely damning.

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yes, demesisx and demeaning_casually are two alts of the same person. There were some others as well, I think they’ve all been banned at this point. They did the standard Lemmy bad-faith-person behavior of being hostile and obviously dishonest with the admin when the admin went to talk with them about it, at that point without the intention of banning them I don’t think. For as unsuccessful a behavior as that is, it’s pretty popular, I’ve dealt with it multiple times. I think the admin was able to find some more detailed information about it than I was, they caught a bunch of different alts.

                The timestamps come from the time that votes get federated, which is often in batches a little bit after they were posted on the origin server. They’re not reliable to the second. If I remember right you’ll see batches of votes even from legitimate users come in all at the same time or within seconds if they’re all on the same instance, and also there tends to be a reliable 30-second cycle on which they all get sent out in those batches. If you look on a scale of minutes, and there tend to be bunched-up votes from apparently different accounts that all are taking the same types of actions, that’s more of a reliable sign of fuckery.

  • sculd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seeing Anderson trying to steer the topic away when Bernie started talking about the greed of insurance companies is hilarious

    • sqgl@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Could have been better if Bernie forgot to turn his phone off and a Mario Brothers ring tone kicked in.

  • harryprayiv@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Modern day politics is about as staged as professional wrestling.

    Stop being as gullible as a Hulkamaniac.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, Bernie Sanders was getting arrested at civil rights protests in the early 60s, and then writing op-eds about how socialism was the answer and a better world is possible in the 80s, because he was all being built up as a fake candidate for the present day and all leading up to where CNN wanted people going on and talking about wealth inequality and problems in the health care system.

      Clearly. It all makes perfect sense. You’re actually 100% correct as far as the whole operation being pretty much fake, but then someone comes on who’s trying to poke a hole in the fakeness and you’re getting real emotional and insulting about how that, we have to not pay attention to.

      Also, you participated a little bit with the voter-fraud user down below.

      Fascinating.