• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    Aha!

    IGN waits 48 hrs to have an opinion, and they go with offensive.

    No, that’s not hard enough, you fucking shills.

    Its criminal. It subverts the entire concept of personal property rights. It is so offensive that to let it stand would be an ongoing affront to quite literally human rights.

    If you allow a paradigm to exist, in an increasingly digital world and economy, that your digital goods can be evaporated, at whim, by the seller, after you purchased them, with no refund?

    You get cyberpunk dystopia from this. You turn corporations formally into more powerful entities than most states.

    The only reason you fucking morons describe this as baffling is because you are their second order PR agency. You’re idiots, its been obvious this was the plan for over a decade… you cannot possibly be surprised by this without being corporate cucks.

    You fucking cunts dare to angle yourselves as sharing the same concerns as SKG, as Ross Scott?

    Where the fuck were you a decade ago when Ross started talking about this? You’re a goddamned media company, you could have signal boosted him this whole fucking time… or even just mentioned it, maybe?

    Fuck you Luke, you duplicitous bootlicking hack.

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 小时前

      Sony has a shitty history of anti-consumer behaviours, and no one should buy anything from them, but not selling something isn’t a crime; it’s not even illegal.