• 13 Posts
  • 1.3K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 10th, 2025

help-circle


  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldThe Works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Roughly that pose, camera a bit to the left of where it is here.

    You’ll be able to see everything mentioned, I guess excepting literally the butthole, but, you’ll be able to see a good deal of butt cheeks.

    You could also reorient this same rough pose but her left knee, right foot and left hand are on the ground, right hand is on a table or chair or something, and the camera/pov is perhaps a bit unrealistically into the ground, or, as if she’s on a see-through surface.

    Basically, being climbed over.

    EDIT

    And here’s the source/credit:

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/290763719692532504/








  • Fair enough lol, guns are one of my… autistic hobbies…

    It just seemed wrong, pulled up wiki pages, that’s just what I noticed in 5 or 10 minutes.

    It /kind of/ looks like a modernization basically overhaul that was done to the 74, seemingly as a pilot program… roughly around the same time the AK-100 series was being developed… bit its still kinda wrong, in various spots.


  • I imagine most people consider this cursed because of the ‘mayonnaise’.

    I consider this cursed because this is ostensibly an AK 74, but it has an AR15 style buffer tube / buttstock.

    … and a Pic rail on top of the gas blowback tube / gas block near the front post sight.

    If its supposed to be an AK-12, sight should be on that part of the tube, and not the barrel.

    … and the grip is wrong.

    … and the rear sight is in the wrong spot, if its supposed to be a 74.

    … and the magazine is wrong, if its supposed to be a 12.

    … and the fire mode selector is also just wrong.

    Its a franken-AK, or maybe an extremely ‘bubba’d’ AK.




  • I mean, do those headcount numbers count contractors?

    V dashes? A dashes? Etc?

    The majority of MSFT’s workforce has been temp contractors for a very long time, and they do everything they can to have as few actual employees as possible.

    If your source is saying the average tenure is 5.3 years, no, no it is not counting contractors.

    Beyond that, unless you have an actual source for the culture shift beyond ‘you think so’, I’m going with no, everything I’ve described has gotten worse.

    That’s why I’ve, for years, been able to predict moves that MSFT would likely make, that people at the time think are ludicrous or incredibly pessimistic, worst case scenarios… and then they happen.

    As an example, I was saying MSFT probably just set Xbox with impossibly unrealistic profit targets for the Xbox/Gaming division, to more or less intentionally downsize it and then basically kill it off, over time, while acting like that’s not what they were doing… I said that a good deal of time before the news broke, that is exactly what happened.

    They are a gormless faceless machine that is unimaginably high on their own supply.

    Given the amount of outright caste based racism I saw amongst Indian actual employees vs Indian contractors when I was there, where HR told.me that actually ‘that’s just their culture’ and that I was being racist for pointing out abusive managers literally screaming at their lower caste underlings, whom they had by their H1-B balls…

    …yeah, I’m willing to bet it is now even worse.

    I’ve also worked at other large corps, a place or two in fairly high responsibilty positions.

    I’ve met a fair deal of the Seattle/Bellevue/Redmond upper management of various texh and other firms, and the thing they all have in common is an unimaginably inflated ego, elitist attitude, that propogates downward via basically an essentially religious level of respect for people in higher positions… its just expected to be shown by anyone under them.

    They really are like the corpos from Cyberpunk 77, they just don’t have the nakedly open bloodlust most of those corpos do.






  • You can orgasm without a partner. Same goes for toys. That’s not sex. It’s not even unusual for asexual people do all that.

    And you can orgasm safely with a partner, if you are educated about sex, understand your own body, your partner’s body, follow best practices, and those involved are honest with each other.

    And yes, its not even unusual for asexual people to do that.

    And I would argue it is generally much, muuuuch more interesting and enjoyable to orgasm with a person, who at the very least is excited by the prospect of being part of that, than it is to jerk off or flick your bean on your own.

    Hell, a lot of women don’t even know what an orgasm feels like, because women have different possible modes of actually getting to a climax, many are capable of different kinds of orgasms, and many of them just can only/most reliably reach orgasm by a means that would require a partner or a toy.

    As an example: ‘the G Spot’. Different women have differently sized snd shaped ‘spots’, some just basically don’t meaningfully have one, some can basically only climax when g spot stimulation is involved, for others, the g spot stimulation is basically inconsequential.

    Limiting amount of partners to single digits or even just one reduces the odds of issues drastically. It’s not a religious thing.

    Don’t think I ever said it was religious thing, so uh, sure, ok.

    And … I mean yes, less sex you have with people is strictly speaking less likely to land you with an STI STD, extremely broadly.

    But safe sex is a thing, and it isn’t really that hard to do between two moderately intelligent, trustworthy, consenting adults.

    Its also pretty easy to avoid an unwanted pregnancy, unless you or the place you live has some sort of ‘religious thing’ impeding that.

    Y’all look like those teens that got to live separately from their parents to start eating sweets 100% time instead of normal food cause it’s tastier. Fun for a while. Bad idea in the long run.

    … I’m in my 30s.

    I’ve had boring sex and extremely interesting sex, and that’s actually not been significantly linked to me and my partner’s age… it has much more to do with sexual compatibility, being into the same kinds of things, communication styles.

    I’ve also just been single, as in alone, without any sex, for spans of years between me being 16 and how old I am now.

    Personally, I would not advocate just trying to max out your body count ASAP just for the sake of doing that.

    I’ve just had a number of relationships that lasted for a while, were good for a while, didn’t work out in the end, mixed with some periods of just dating around very casually for a while, mixed with some periods of just focusing on myself.

    You’re thinking of someone who is 18 and has already had 10 to 20 sexual partners, someone who is in their 20s and has had 50 to 80 partners or something like that.

    Yeah, sure, that’s maybe getting to the point where you are significantly impacting your ability to long term pair bond with a person.

    But those kinds of people are actually pretty darn rare, roughly less than 5% of even the most promiscuous Western societies.

    What is much, much more common is for people to greatly exagerate the number of partners they’ve had, because either they think it makes them sound cool, or they’re in a social group which praises that, or both.

    But even still: Some people just don’t want a permanent partner, never did and never will, just like how some people don’t ever want to have kids or start a family.


  • I mean, Facebook and Tiktok have literally both studied, in extensive detail, how to advertise to children, the mental effects their platforms have on children, and of course how to leverage both of those things together.

    This is public knowledge, they’ve been in court over it.

    Facebook is massively coddling Trumps balls, and Tiktok is basically literally owned by him/his cronies.

    They do not even need to pretend that any laws apply to them.