Oh no!

I will continue not paying a dime for any media I see ever, unless I really support the creators, as I have been doing for … 20 years now?

In addition to broadly prevalent ‘traditional’ norms promoted and espoused by men in many, many parts of the US, that assert that caring for a child is innately feminine…

Tons of American women also actively promote patriarchy, they’d call these guys gay and not real men, for taking care of their kids, for being stay at home dads.

To be fair, there absolutely were Christian servers back in the old days, that absolutely would ban you for cursing or taking the Lord’s name in vain.

I saw this in … shit, Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2, Garry’s Mod before it was even sold for money, various source games and mods… Red Orchestra… all kinds of games that had dedicated servers back in the early 00s, there would usually be a couple that were explicitly Christian and would ban you for swearing.

This is objectively the correct thing to do if you are from an abusive family that has aggressively attempted to destroy your life, same thing if you are essentially the cuck/punching bag of a friend group.

If you’ve been surrounded and gaslit by horrible people your whole life, yeah, running away and hiding is actually the right call, at least untill you develop an actually healthy sense of self.

Its also just fine to be an introvert, just try to mix that up with at least a smidgen of regular socializing.

Yeah, this aggresively does not make sense.

There are a ton of eggs that have been broken by way of playing New Vegas.

Wow, its like… direct action works, when complaining loudly and formally doesn’t!

I can still hardly believe that the tech industry at large just decided to broadly roll out LLM integration into essentially every element of their businesses, having just no idea what they actually do.

Like 2 years ago now, I was figuratively pulling my hair out, reading the discussion panel schedule for Microsoft led conferences on LLMs and cybersecurity.

Literally every topic was a different kind of way that smashing an LLM into a complex business system… increases potential failure points, broadens attack surfaces… because networked LLMs literally are security vulnerabilities.

Not a single topic about how to use LLMs defensively, how to use them to turbocharge malware signature recognition, nothing like that.

All just a bunch of ‘make sure you don’t do this!’ warnings, and then everyone did them anyway.

Well you got me there.

https://github.com/SteamTracking/SteamTracking/tree/master/ProtobufsWebui

There’s the directory with the file in the screenshots, service_steamgpt.proto, updated 4 days ago along with a number of others, seems like it and a whole batch of related files did not exist before then.

I am uncertain if this … basically scraping operation is tracking the main Steam client or the Beta or what.

There is not a very helpful description of what exactly is being pulled here, in the readme/project description.

EDIT:

Perhaps if you are more familiar with Protobufs, you can take a gander at these and come away with a guesstimate as to what these are doing?

This is not meant to be a chatbot.

It is meant to evaluate gaming sessions of CS2 (and/or potentially any VAC enabled game, maybe).

Its an experimental, prototype of improving VAC’s serverside, backend analysis capabilities, to better detect cheaters and hackers.

You don’t need kernel level access into everyone’s pcs.

You can run analytics on what the server records as happening in the game session, to detect odd patterns and things that should be impossible.

LLMs are … the entire thing that they do is handle massive inputs of data, and then evaluate that data.

The part of an LLM that generates a response, in text form, to that data, is a whole other thing.

They can also output… code, or spreadsheets, or images, or 3d models, or… any other kind of data.

Like say, a printout of suspicious activity in a game session, with statistically derived confidence intervals and timestamps and analysis.

The you have another, differently tuned LLM, ingest the data the first LLM produces, and turn it into something else.

You see the ModelEvaluation and then MetaModelEvaluation?

That looks like what they’re doing to me.

Detailed Server Logs -> Model Evaluation -> MetaModelEvaluation.

If you’ve ever run a dedicated multiplayer server and had to deal with hackers… you’re gonna be looking through server logs to sniff out nonsense.

Server-side cheat detection, very oversimplified, is having automatic systems do that.

The file and class or function name or w/e literally has .proto in it.

As in prototype.

Valve’s customer service responses have always been mostly a canned series of bot messages.

Their in-house support has always been 99% automated.

Its very obvious if you’ve ever interacted with them at more than an occasional, superficial level.

You have to be quite persistent to get a message from an actual human being.

Yep, the automated messages often have the name of ostensibly a human attached to them.

So do all kinds of other bots, since way before ChatGPT and LLMs took off.

What, did you a think a human person actually read every single complaint report of a hacker or cheater in a video game with any kind of a massively used anti cheat system?

No! You have bots, analytic systems, screen that shit, just the same as all our resumes on Indeed, or our activity and profiles on dating apps have been being analysed and evaluated by bots, again, since way before LLMs got as prevalent as they are today.

Then you filter. Humans only see the odd ones that defy categorization, basically, or trigger a certain set of flags that are designated as ‘probably needs an actual human to handle this one’.

This has been a tech industry standard for almost two decades.

Valve is just now overhauling that system to use an LLM, because those are actually better than a very complex series of chained regex searches.

The alternative would be to do what Meta or Google or Amazon do: Hire armies of tens to hundreds of thousands of offshore contractors and give them all PTSD for pitiful wages, manually evaluating everything.

Apparently this is not widely known, by people who’ve never worked in an entreprise level tech company?

Using LLMs to evaluate and assist a massive anti-cheat system is actually a great way to be be able to do an anti-cheat system… without hooking directly into your kernel.

These things are very good at pattern recognition, and if you tune them to specifically only work with inputs from the server from gaming sessions, you can significantly improve server-side/backend detection of players/clients doing things that are highly suspicious or outright impossible given the actual rules of the game.

I think it was just one guy, but basically yeah, iirc, he was originally building it in Unity, then switched to Godot.

Yeah see this is my whole main problem.

The writing and story are just… ok?

I could identify the racist tropes and body shaming just interwoven into the whole series before I hit puberty.

Oh then of course slavery is good sometimes actually, here I invented a scenario where this is true.

I got bored of Harry Potter, and just reread Animorphs.

Which certainly has problematic characters and moments and events… but … they are bad things, that the characters have to actually deal with, its a much more complex and engaging story overall, imo, though of course the serial format means that some books are not so great in comparison to others.

Kinda the same thing with Redwall.

It is a name people have.

Like Jesús, or Mohammed.

Yeah, I appreciate those games as technical endeavors… I do not appreciate them as a player, as its very clear that they are essentially designed to troll you, the player.

I’m not that much of a sweat/masochist, christ.

For other genre-flavored Godot fans:

https://steamcommunity.com/games/1963610/announcements/detail/538883150377388601

Road to Vostok is made in Godot, just went Early Access.

Godot can do more than cutesy/2D games.

Its somewhere between Escape from Tarkov and Stalker, single player.

Oh, also, at least for the vast majority of the development, if not still currently: Just one dude.

He’s written a lot more on his LinkedIn profile, and he said he was going to do this ~6 months ago, “when it was safe”, so I highly suspect he is lawyered up and has actual documented evidence for a lot, if not all of what he’s saying.

The ‘news’ articles about this are basicslly just random snippets of quotes from his LinkedIn messages… I’m not sure if any outlet has done a total, comprehensive breakdown yet.

Has MSFT extended their gaslighting to include:

Actually, a highly trained, educated, and capable NASA astronaut is just not using our product correctly.

???

It really is farsical the degree to which they act like you are just some kind of idiot if their horrendously designed software isn’t immediately comprehensible and obvious to you.

Possible recovery technique:

“Whoo, too much coffee, I was apparently a bit too eager for this meeting!”

Cheesy as fuck, but at least you are attempting a recovery, and acknowledging what happened.