I think you overestimate the ability of biological women to hold their own against biological men once the men are >14 years old. Women deal less forceful blows and they usually have shorter stature which reduces leverage, this reducing force of attack and wrestling ability. They have less grip strength usually, and will struggle to reach the man.
In other words: it doesn’t really happen? Also why exactly would violence be based, anyway? If this is some sort of reaction to men attacking women, then pretending there are “based women who beat on men” doesn’t really solve that issue, nor does it necessarily solve any problems if it actually happens.
If we are talking about literal boys and girls, I’m never going to celebrate kids beating each other up. That’s just weird.
This makes it sound as if women never commit violence against men, which is just not true. Most people are not always on edge ready to fight for their life, fights are not always decided by whoever is physically stronger.
And even though it’s a crime to beat someone in most countries, this sort of violence, especially if it’s of sexual nature, is probably somewhere around the most underreported ones.
If a man tells someone he was beaten by a woman, he is automatically a laughingstock material, because “oh, men are physically stronger than women, no way that happened”. It’s even worse for rape, because there is no concept of men not consenting to sex in the “traditional” masculinity image.
Generally that’s true, but not always, also beating someone up is not necesarily related to physocal ability. You can notice the post says “nerd boy” or something along those lines. This probably implies not only someone that likely does not exercise much making them weaker but probably also someone insecure meaning they’re less likely to fight back.
Also. What you say also makes it generally more acceptable for women to harm men. My brother once got hit by a woman and the literal principal of the school just said like something that he should not be complaining for a woman hitting him or something like that. That’s obviously not a good principal and I find the situation funny but like because of the same thing that like men can’t harm women and that you know. (Harmful to both sides I would say anyways, no one should be hurting anyone and anyone should be defending themselves.)
Also I think the original comment was a joke.
Also if a trans-woman is on HRT the physical abilities should not be that different from a cis-woman, sure there’s still the height but there are still exceptions like the person just being short, having one of those surgeries that make you shorter, the other person being tall, or having started HRT in puberty and that kind of stuff.
Also this is just what I know and consider based on what I know and personal experience and I could of course be wrong.
If a women wants to beat up men she just needs to take MMA for a year then find someone she is size matched with. There is no shortage of men who can’t fight.
I think you overestimate the ability of biological women to hold their own against biological men once the men are >14 years old. Women deal less forceful blows and they usually have shorter stature which reduces leverage, this reducing force of attack and wrestling ability. They have less grip strength usually, and will struggle to reach the man.
In other words: it doesn’t really happen? Also why exactly would violence be based, anyway? If this is some sort of reaction to men attacking women, then pretending there are “based women who beat on men” doesn’t really solve that issue, nor does it necessarily solve any problems if it actually happens.
If we are talking about literal boys and girls, I’m never going to celebrate kids beating each other up. That’s just weird.
This makes it sound as if women never commit violence against men, which is just not true. Most people are not always on edge ready to fight for their life, fights are not always decided by whoever is physically stronger.
And even though it’s a crime to beat someone in most countries, this sort of violence, especially if it’s of sexual nature, is probably somewhere around the most underreported ones.
If a man tells someone he was beaten by a woman, he is automatically a laughingstock material, because “oh, men are physically stronger than women, no way that happened”. It’s even worse for rape, because there is no concept of men not consenting to sex in the “traditional” masculinity image.
Generally that’s true, but not always, also beating someone up is not necesarily related to physocal ability. You can notice the post says “nerd boy” or something along those lines. This probably implies not only someone that likely does not exercise much making them weaker but probably also someone insecure meaning they’re less likely to fight back.
Also. What you say also makes it generally more acceptable for women to harm men. My brother once got hit by a woman and the literal principal of the school just said like something that he should not be complaining for a woman hitting him or something like that. That’s obviously not a good principal and I find the situation funny but like because of the same thing that like men can’t harm women and that you know. (Harmful to both sides I would say anyways, no one should be hurting anyone and anyone should be defending themselves.)
Also I think the original comment was a joke.
Also if a trans-woman is on HRT the physical abilities should not be that different from a cis-woman, sure there’s still the height but there are still exceptions like the person just being short, having one of those surgeries that make you shorter, the other person being tall, or having started HRT in puberty and that kind of stuff.
Also this is just what I know and consider based on what I know and personal experience and I could of course be wrong.
If a women wants to beat up men she just needs to take MMA for a year then find someone she is size matched with. There is no shortage of men who can’t fight.