the KIDS act may or may not pass the US senate, the EU is planning a social media ban, chat control might pass, etc… what exactly do i have to do to prep for all this?

  • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Yes! I totally agree. I did do host a public yacy instance over I2P already (search engine)

    I have been experimenting with Lemmy and stoat over I2P. I did get them working but it is still a big Hassel. Also for anyone wanting to try hosting stoat. You can’t use i2pd because it doesnt implement full socks which breaks some of the http headers you need with stoat.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      If you can actually figure out some more shit there, document it, that would be extremely useful information, imo.

      Theoretically, at least a modified version of lemmy should be constructible within I2P land… but trying to make it accessible via clearnet would… almost certainly be basically not worth it, and arguably defeat the entire point?

      It is possible to use I2P as effectively an extremely complex VPN sort of thing for clearnet, via outproxies, but you then just have to trust the outproxy, basically.

      • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would not make it accessible on the clearnet. Kinda defaults the purpose. I rather have things be usable like normal but over I2P.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 minutes ago

          Agreed, it would make little sense to me also, to try to make an eepsite federated forum messaging protocol… thing … also work in clearnet, just keep them apart.

          I’d actually be surprised if there aren’t already eep-chans, 4chan/2chan/whatevers that exist in eepland.