• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The ability to endure it and survive - even thrive - in the face of it will vary heavily based on national leadership.

      • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Tell that to the vast swathes of the globe, including China, due to face lethal wet bulb temperatures within the next 10-20 years. Which, along with mass death, means massive breadbasket failures on multiple fronts. Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah, and someone was just arguing with me in a different thread saying vertical warehouse farming is stupid and we should just grow our crops in the ground outside 🙄

          Like, I’m trying to be helpful here, but sure let’s continue to make no systemic changes to the way things are done and just be frustrated when our problems only continue to get worse…

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          lethal wet bulb temperatures

          Europe wants to rebalance trade with Beijing, but can’t quit Chinese air conditioners

          One country is producing all of the world’s air conditioners. I wonder if they’re in a better position to endure wet-bulb temperatures than their peers.

          Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

          They absolutely can and will. This is a country that can build the infrastructure to keep people from dying of overheating. What’s more, this is the country that can export that infrastructure globally, such that its allies will see improved survivability. And that will have cascading knock-on effects.

          The ability to survive climate change is the ability to operate as a global center of gravity.

          • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Are we talking about the same country here? Where in “southern” provinces like Sichuan there is no heating provided in buildings? And people rely on electric heaters and blankets to stay warm?

          • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I think you missed the ‘massive breadbasket failures’ part of my comment. You can’t air condition a field of rice. Well, you could, but good luck trying that on the scale needed to feed everyone once crops begin to fail globally.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            You do realize how many people in the world live in houses that aren’t even fully-enclosed, right? Usually in some of the places that will be most impacted by climate change, too. Air conditioners won’t be of much help to them.

            Also, do you know how much coal China burns each year?

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              many people in the world live in houses that aren’t even fully-enclosed, right?

              It’s crazy that you treat this as an insurmountable obstacle. Much less that there’s no political cache in surmounting it.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Okay so just send in the Chinese with their concrete and bulldoze these people’s homes to build them nice new climate-controlled living spaces while also indebting them in higher amounts than they’re likely to make in their lifetimes.

                Cause that’s different from colonialism how?

                “Don’t worry, primitives, we’re here to surmount your obstacles for you. Because it’s totally our place to decide that.”

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That, and natural resources. Idk how many freshwater lakes and rivers Mexico has but it’s not looking good for the ones they do have.

      • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Kind of, I guess. Depends on if there any animals larger than a cat left after the temperature change stops and levels off.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Depends if we can adapt them quickly enough to survive.

          Brazil has been dismantling our biotech sector for 20 years now, so I’m not optimist, but YMMV.

          Anyway, I’m more optimist on avoiding problem than on dealing with it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          High temperatures don’t preclude large lifeforms. Just ask the dinosaurs.

          But you need the ability to adapt at speed and scale for the entire ecological colony. You can’t rely on biomes that cater exclusively to a handful of apex predators.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              The planet has been undergoing the 6th global extinction event in its history for over 30,000 years. During this time period, humanity has flourished even as millions of other species have died out.

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Sure, until we used fossil fuels to accelerate our growth to absurd numbers, killed most other large wild mammal species, and started pumping ancient buried carbon into the atmosphere at a rate exceeding any other co2 related extinction event in the planet’s history.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Fertilizer has been at the heart of an enormous uptick in arable land and crop volume. That’s the direct result of fossil fuel infrastructure.

                  We are farther away from extinction than we’ve ever been.

                  • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Actually artificial fertilizer comes from the Haaber Bosch process, which uses fossil fuels to turn air into nitrogen.

                    Every species in overshoot seems to be as far from extinction as it ever was directly before the population crash, lol.