Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 20 hours agoDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1906
arrow-up1906imageDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 20 hours agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareDpek@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·17 hours agoHave more ram then the cpu can address What worse bottleneck then not being able to boot? (If anyone has this problem i will gladly take the ram)
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 minutes agoI don’t think that results in a failure to boot. Not to mention 64bit addressable space is like 16 QB (though I’m not sure all bits have traces since we’re still orders of magnitude away from being able to use all those bits).
Have more ram then the cpu can address
What worse bottleneck then not being able to boot?
(If anyone has this problem i will gladly take the ram)
I don’t think that results in a failure to boot. Not to mention 64bit addressable space is like 16 QB (though I’m not sure all bits have traces since we’re still orders of magnitude away from being able to use all those bits).