pedrobear@altgag.net to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoRomanes eunt domusaltgag.netimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1400
arrow-up1400imageRomanes eunt domusaltgag.netpedrobear@altgag.net to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up44·1 day agoI don’t think the Roman’s or Greeks had B 17 bombers
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-210 hours agoOf course not: it makes sense that Bomber numbers were much lower in Ancient times. Also the Romans would’ve used roman numerals. So Roman bombers would probably be B II, B III, maybe even B IV
minus-squareBatman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 day agomaybe they were all shot down due to sampling bias? would have been B XVII .
I don’t think the Roman’s or Greeks had B 17 bombers
Of course not: it makes sense that Bomber numbers were much lower in Ancient times. Also the Romans would’ve used roman numerals.
So Roman bombers would probably be B II, B III, maybe even B IV
Do you have a source on that?
No
maybe they were all shot down due to sampling bias? would have been B XVII .