☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 hours agoPeople are starting to get itlemmy.mlimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1386
arrow-up1386imagePeople are starting to get itlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoI wasn’t asking you a question, I was providing an explanation of why China having billionaires is not at odds with China being socialist which seemed to be the argument you were making in this thread.
minus-squareSaapas@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoBut I did engage with that. I said many probably don’t know the reasoning for having billionaires, hence they would be disappointed.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 hours agoThen this discussion will be valuable to those people since it provides an explanation for that exact question.
minus-squareSaapas@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoAssuming they see or agree with it, which at least for the former is a very big if
I wasn’t asking you a question, I was providing an explanation of why China having billionaires is not at odds with China being socialist which seemed to be the argument you were making in this thread.
But I did engage with that. I said many probably don’t know the reasoning for having billionaires, hence they would be disappointed.
Then this discussion will be valuable to those people since it provides an explanation for that exact question.
Assuming they see or agree with it, which at least for the former is a very big if