☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoPeople are starting to get itlemmy.mlimagemessage-square152fedilinkarrow-up1567
arrow-up1567imagePeople are starting to get itlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square152fedilink
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoI wasn’t asking you a question, I was providing an explanation of why China having billionaires is not at odds with China being socialist which seemed to be the argument you were making in this thread.
minus-squareSaapas@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoBut I did engage with that. I said many probably don’t know the reasoning for having billionaires, hence they would be disappointed.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoThen this discussion will be valuable to those people since it provides an explanation for that exact question.
minus-squareSaapas@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoAssuming they see or agree with it, which at least for the former is a very big if
I wasn’t asking you a question, I was providing an explanation of why China having billionaires is not at odds with China being socialist which seemed to be the argument you were making in this thread.
But I did engage with that. I said many probably don’t know the reasoning for having billionaires, hence they would be disappointed.
Then this discussion will be valuable to those people since it provides an explanation for that exact question.
Assuming they see or agree with it, which at least for the former is a very big if