• A404@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Also people getting together, organizing to destroy the system is itself a system.

    Yes? We are not anti-system lol.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Actually, centralization of management creates a lot of benefits in communication flow, resource allocation and operating efficiency. Lack of centralization results in confusion and task duplication.

          • A404@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Lack of centralization results in confusion and task duplication.

            This sounds a communication problem, not a system problem. Decentralized systems are good at adapting to changing environments and are typically harder to destroy. If the complex systems theory side of organisation interests you i would recommend you to check out the desktop regulatory state..

          • compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I mean, my political interest tends more towards “what’s the best tangible next step forward” rather than “what’s the ideal way to organize society in theory”. But generally speaking, I’d suggest it be organized from the bottom up through confederations of directly democratic bodies like workers’ councils and municipalities, making decisions via consensus and recallable delegates.