• 0 Posts
  • 487 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle

  • When you watch the video, it doesn’t quite make the same impression.

    What impression do you get?

    I see a single civilian facing down a column of tanks. If anything, seeing the context of the photo makes him look more brave.

    And for more context, everyone should know more about the events leading up to the massacre, just how large the protests were, what happened during, and the aftermath:

    Content warning: violence, blood, gore, death

    https://archive.ph/7Tdzh

    I think it’s important to understand this part:

    Donald’s cable to London described the “atrocities” against several thousand pro-democracy protesters as being undertaken by the 27th Army of Shanxi Province. He called this truculent group of soldiers “60 percent illiterate” and “primitives.”

    According to Donald and his trusted source, however, the troops that entered Tiananmen Square prior to the 27th Army were unarmed. This was an initial attempt to disperse the massive group of protesters without violence, as most were students, unarmed, and non-violent.

    […]

    “The 27 Army APCs (armored personnel carriers) opened fire on the crowd before running over them,” Donald wrote in his cable. “APCs ran over troops and civilians at 65kph (40 miles per hour).”

    He explained that even though the CCP had provided protestors with a warning, even this small amount of leeway was underhanded, a lie, and viciously broken.

    “Students understood they were given one hour to leave square, but after five minutes APCs attacked,” Donald said.

    […]

    “Students linked arms but were mown down,” wrote Donald. “APCs then ran over the bodies time and time again to make, quote ‘pie’ unquote, and remains collected by bulldozer.”

    As if this wasn’t atrocious enough, the government’s criminal and brutal activity that day got even worse. With no regard for the families of these victims, not to mention their identities, what was left of them was disposed of — in an unspeakably callous manner.

    “Remains incinerated and then hosed down drains,” Donald wrote.

    […]

    On top of that, the recently declassified cable stated that the 27th Army was called into action that day specifically because of its disregard for anything but orders. The troops were “the most reliable and obedient,” Donald explained.

    “27 Army ordered to spare no one,” he wrote. “Wounded girl students begged for their lives but were bayoneted. A three-year-old girl was injured, but her mother was shot as she went to her aid, as were six others.”

    The first group of Chinese military didn’t kill anyone, by some accounts wouldn’t kill anyone, and attempted to disperse the students peacefully. This didn’t work, so the CCP called in a group of brainwashed thugs who could be relied on to kill anyone they were instructed to, and they did, with no regard for life and no respect for the dead. Those thugs made the CCP what it is today, and there is still no regard for life or respect for the dead, which is why they are so desperate to hide information about what happened, spread disinformation, and suppress memorials.

    Never let these people, or the crimes committed against them, be forgotten.










  • No, we’re talking about companies scraping hundreds of millions if not billions of labor hours of output to train their models for the sake of developing software products which they then sell for profit.

    Every model that was trained on legally acquired free public data and open source code should be freely publicly available and open source.

    Every model that was trained on not legally acquired public data (e.g. Meta’s models) should be taken out of production until all of the lawsuits are concluded, and hopefully the parties responsible are put out of business.

    I’m not talking about future, potential labor that AI might replace. I’m talking about the labor which was stolen to produce these models in the first place.

    But, please use AI.


  • Please identify the issues with the LLM generated code.

    Why would the issues be obvious and easy to point out? Most issues with code aren’t. If they were, we wouldn’t have Patch Tuesday, a direct code review would prevent issues from shipping in the first place.

    Throwing this out as if it means LLM code is acceptable and ends the argument is ridiculous. Do you have any grasp of how software vulnerabilities are discovered at all?





  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubtoxkcd@lemmy.worldxkcd #3245: Results Age
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Telnet is basically the predecessor to SSH for terminal-over-network communications:

    It is a protocol for bidirectional 8-bit communications. Its main goal was to connect terminal devices and terminal-oriented processes.

    At this point, it is archaic network technology:

    Telnet was originally developed for ARPANET in 1969.

    It was developed in a time when only very specific organizations with lots of funding had access to computer networking. The Mother of All Demos had happened only the year prior. The first version of the Internet Protocol used today would not come until 1973.

    There was no concern that unauthorized parties might eavesdrop on the communications between networked computers. Also, at this time there were no functional computer networks that extended beyond local sites. The first ARPANET nodes would not start communicating with each other until 1970:

    The first four nodes were designated as a testbed for developing and debugging the 1822 protocol, which was a major undertaking. While they were connected electronically in 1969, network applications were not possible until the Network Control Program was implemented in 1970 enabling the first two host-host protocols, remote login (Telnet) and file transfer (FTP) which were specified and implemented between 1969 and 1973.

    There weren’t interstate or international network connections, or public routing architecture or DNS or anything like that.

    So basically, everyone who could possibly access your computer network would have to be on site, and probably in the room with the (very classified) government research computers. At this point you could count the number of people who really understood computer networking technology (globally) on your fingers and toes. If you happened to be working in this field, you could probably name offhand all of the people who understood enough about the technology that could possibly pull off a vulnerability exploit against Telnet, and you very likely knew them personally. Cybersecurity wasn’t a thing that anyone was worrying about yet.

    All of the security features that have been added to Telnet are afterthoughts, bolted on to the original system. It was never designed for the public Internet that we have today. And yet… there is still legacy technology out there that uses Telnet for remote access and administration, some of it in critical infrastructure like power grids and water systems.

    Ultimately, my point is that it’s very very difficult to eliminate communications technologies once any kind of industrial, commercial or government activity starts to use them for regular business. It’s one of Microsoft’s biggest problems with the products that they have been selling to various enterprises since the 90s (Windows Desktop, Windows Server, Active Directory, Word, Excel, etc) - they’re forced to maintain compatibility with legacy stuff even when they know without a doubt that it creates major security problems, because there are too many organizations dependent on that software. The Internet is like this now, and the people who were part of its foundation are dying off.