

This is an expression of privilege.
Beatrice comes from a background where she has access to affordable housing that doesn’t require her to work a high-income high-effort career or multiple jobs just to pay rent. She has a stable enough life that provides time to spend on personal hobbies rather than constantly working to cover expenses. Beatrice’s lifestyle is being subsidized by someone else. Beatrice does not have to work for a living.
Margaret is providing for herself, at the cost of luxury time. Her housing situation is less stable, and she’s aware of it, and feels trapped by the cost of it, which is her personal life and free time. Margaret has to work for a living.
Beatrice is privileged, and is judging Margaret’s life from her own place of privilege. Margaret is realizing that no matter how hard she works, she will never gain access to Beatrice’s level of privileged lifestyle, and that is crushing her soul.











A well-reasoned and thoughtful response, with a clear demonstration of an experienced writer’s capacity for nuance.
*Edit: sarcasm aside, my point is that the comic should be interpreted as an indictment of a socioeconomic system which forces people into situations where they must burn themselves up in order to survive. It should not be interpreted as an indictment of Margaret’s life choices. Margaret is doing her best in a world that has not provided her the opportunity to really flourish as an individual. To judge Margaret for this is at best narrow minded.