themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21日前Chat Control 1.0 passed the European Parliament — through the back doorwww.euronews.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1478file-text
arrow-up1478external-linkChat Control 1.0 passed the European Parliament — through the back doorwww.euronews.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21日前message-square64fedilinkfile-text
https://www.tradingview.com/news/cointelegraph:9e6975706094b:0-eu-parliament-passes-chat-control-allowing-private-chat-scans-until-2028/
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19時間前Never heard of a parliament where abstain = no. Is that common?
minus-squarewonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·19時間前If there’s a threshold needed for a “yes” vote then it’s functionally the same, even without counting as one. I’m just saying that threshold shouldn’t go down just because someone is on vacation.
Never heard of a parliament where abstain = no. Is that common?
If there’s a threshold needed for a “yes” vote then it’s functionally the same, even without counting as one. I’m just saying that threshold shouldn’t go down just because someone is on vacation.